Dr. Gamble video sample:DaveGamble wrote:It seems plausible you may be in for a future of staring at my massive beard while I talk about EQ.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQJbFFZiWVY
Dr. Gamble video sample:DaveGamble wrote:It seems plausible you may be in for a future of staring at my massive beard while I talk about EQ.
antithesist wrote:Dr. Gamble video sample:DaveGamble wrote:It seems plausible you may be in for a future of staring at my massive beard while I talk about EQ.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQJbFFZiWVY
It works OK here:mustgroove wrote:Small bug I've noticed - the "Digital + Phase" setting doesn't propagate to other instances when clicking "Propagate..." on the DSP page... not sure whether it's also the case on the "Render DSP" page
Setup->GUI->Graph->Mousewheel Ctrl does exactly that.djscorb wrote:Perhaps we can ask Dave to add an extra option for Mouse wheel control. At present mouse wheel adjusts Q or, when holding Ctrl / Apple, switches mouse wheel to Gain. A pref to allow switching one of these options to control Frequency could be good for some users yeah.
On the todo list alreadyI've also thought that having some way to save favourite band settings and being able to drop them in quickly would be really nice. Maybe a preference for selecting your default band types etc for Peak, Bells and Filters too would make for a faster workflow.
Of course I'm aware of this, but the current default sensitivity is way too coarse IMO, so I think we could use a preference to set the sensitivity. I don't want to be holding down the shift key every time I'm making adjustments.djscorb wrote: You know that holding shift gives you ultra fine control when adjusting from the graph or Tooltips? This might go most of the way to achieve your first point.
Since they provide the same "cumulative minimum phase response" as each other, how do they differ?Analogue and Zero-latency analogue provide the same cumulative minimum phase response as hardware.
I asked Dave this before, either in this thread, or the one in GS. I'm pretty sure he said it changes the phase response to be more like analogue phase, whilst still retaining the low CPU hit of IIR mode. Have a search here or on GS for "Digital+" in the relevant thread. If I find it I'll post the link too.vicoli wrote:I'm trying to understand the difference between IIR and IIRDigital+Compensation modes -- trying to understand technically what the manual means by "the extra edge" on page 19. Are IIR and IIRDigital+Compensation modes supposed to yield different magnitude responses? I'm testing (running my DAW at 48,000Hz) on pink noise, with a bell filter at 22,000Hz, and when I turn Digital+Compensation on (set to 512) and off, I see no difference in the magnitude response shown in the Equilibrium analyzer. I also see no difference using Voxengo SPAN.
Is my method of testing defective, or is the difference too small to show up on these analyzers? Or have I misunderstood the purpose of IIRDigital+Compensation mode, and it's not actually about changing the magnitude response?
One has latency?vicoli wrote:In FIR mode, for Phase, what's the difference between "analogue" and "zero-latency analogue"? The manual says,
Since they provide the same "cumulative minimum phase response" as each other, how do they differ?Analogue and Zero-latency analogue provide the same cumulative minimum phase response as hardware.
Thanks for answering, but wouldn't what you're describing be covered by "Digital+Phase" mode, rather than "Digital+Compensation" mode?Hermetech Mastering wrote:I asked Dave this before, either in this thread, or the one in GS. I'm pretty sure he said it changes the phase response to be more like analogue phase, whilst still retaining the low CPU hit of IIR mode. Have a search here or on GS for "Digital+" in the relevant thread. If I find it I'll post the link too.vicoli wrote:I'm trying to understand the difference between IIR and IIRDigital+Compensation modes -- trying to understand technically what the manual means by "the extra edge" on page 19. Are IIR and IIRDigital+Compensation modes supposed to yield different magnitude responses? I'm testing (running my DAW at 48,000Hz) on pink noise, with a bell filter at 22,000Hz, and when I turn Digital+Compensation on (set to 512) and off, I see no difference in the magnitude response shown in the Equilibrium analyzer. I also see no difference using Voxengo SPAN.
Is my method of testing defective, or is the difference too small to show up on these analyzers? Or have I misunderstood the purpose of IIRDigital+Compensation mode, and it's not actually about changing the magnitude response?
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement