Selling your new album without getting involved in Streaming
- Banned
- 2288 posts since 24 Mar, 2015 from Toronto, Canada
The lamb lies on Broadway!
Spotify Soundcloud Soundclick
Gear & Setup: Windows 10, Dual Xeon, 32GB RAM, Cubase 10.5/9.5, NI Komplete Audio 6, NI Maschine, NI Jam, NI Kontakt
Gear & Setup: Windows 10, Dual Xeon, 32GB RAM, Cubase 10.5/9.5, NI Komplete Audio 6, NI Maschine, NI Jam, NI Kontakt
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 43 posts since 29 Apr, 2014
My obsession is not to be used by industry twits and fast buck artists. My obsession is to place a value on art, not to give it away foolishly to millionares who want to use it to put big bicks in their pocket. My obsession is to write great songs. If that irritates you, Virt, deal with it. Again, I am not a hobbyist and music is not a toy to me. At $.006 per play, streaming is offensive. Remember Tidal exists because the artists who own it are getting 3% ownership. I applaud them because they are not being played for fools. The ultimate streaming horror story: P. Williams got 43 million plays for his song "Happy" and received a check for $2700. Ouch! That can't buy my synthesizer. It's a sick joke. That not be me.
- KVRAF
- 8406 posts since 2 Aug, 2005 from Guitar Land, USA
Everything's broken now, walkmans worked, cd's break,mp3 purchase is an odd choice.
This Ipad hurts my fingers, this is advancement?
This Ipad hurts my fingers, this is advancement?
The only site for experimental amp sim freeware & MIDI FX: http://runbeerrun.blogspot.com
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105895 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
is that aimed at me? if so, im not irritated, not in the slightest bit by anything. well not here anyway, too much in my real life irritates me to be worried about what pixels on a screen are up to.If that irritates you, Virt, deal with it.
-
She Changed Her Mind She Changed Her Mind https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=342043
- Banned
- 452 posts since 22 Nov, 2014 from Amsterdam
Purple rain, purple rain..
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105895 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
now prince we can talk about! least i know who that is, not like taylor swift or p. williams? i dont listen to radio or watch tv, so modern stuff mostly passes me by im afraid, unless i happen across it in an actual record store, in which case its usually more underground type stuff as thats the main kinda thing the record stores i frequent trade in
- KVRAF
- 6325 posts since 18 Jul, 2008 from New York
You see this red pixel here -> .vurt wrote:too much in my real life irritates me to be worried about what pixels on a screen are up to.
It's up to no good, I tell ya. It streams music without permission.
-
She Changed Her Mind She Changed Her Mind https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=342043
- Banned
- 452 posts since 22 Nov, 2014 from Amsterdam
I do not listen to the radio or watch tv either, that's not my point in this discussion. Not that it matters.
I don't listen and I do not have a point of view:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q33SoblaZbU
I don't listen and I do not have a point of view:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q33SoblaZbU
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105895 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
She Changed Her Mind She Changed Her Mind https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=342043
- Banned
- 452 posts since 22 Nov, 2014 from Amsterdam
Lol
-
- KVRist
- 217 posts since 23 Nov, 2014
*starts rapping*vurt wrote:ooh i enjoy a good concept albumdebra1rlo wrote:What I'm wondering is, are all your songs about your obsession with music streaming, just like all your posts on KVR?tedinmexico wrote:My thinking now is that I will introduce my album in stages, and extremely slowly. I will start marketing the CD. Months later, I may try selling thru downloads on my own web site, and the new download sites that pop up. I don't see ITunes giving musicians the choice to opt out of streaming in June. Right now computer geeks run the music business. I'd rather sell 100 CD albums and get paid, rather than 20,000 streaming hits and get $50 bucks. That's just stupid to me. As for Tidal, I can't be a part owner and get equity in the experiment like the start artists, so I am not interested in that at all. Right now the music industry is kind of in the toilet. I will stick to my guns. I will not be played by the industry hucksters and fast buck artists. I own all my copyrights and am in the driver's seat. Ultimately, if very talented musicians across the world introduce their music only through normal selling channels, customers will be forced to compenstate them fairly for their work. It's up to each musician. For me, streaming is DOA: worthless.
I don't wanna be havin' them kids streamin' my music
cause' thpse companies be abusin' it
Down and ruin artists' cash flow
Taylor Swift left Itunes dealt a fatal blow
Speak with me my music's mission statement
for all those indies makin' music in their basement
.....
Okay I'll stop now
-
- KVRist
- 217 posts since 23 Nov, 2014
So wait, what is more important to you, making money, or being serious about art? The two are not mutually inclusive.tedinmexico wrote:My obsession is not to be used by industry twits and fast buck artists. My obsession is to place a value on art, not to give it away foolishly to millionares who want to use it to put big bicks in their pocket. My obsession is to write great songs. If that irritates you, Virt, deal with it. Again, I am not a hobbyist and music is not a toy to me. At $.006 per play, streaming is offensive. Remember Tidal exists because the artists who own it are getting 3% ownership. I applaud them because they are not being played for fools. The ultimate streaming horror story: P. Williams got 43 million plays for his song "Happy" and received a check for $2700. Ouch! That can't buy my synthesizer. It's a sick joke. That not be me.
I mean, you sound all serious business, which is fine. Some great artists are serious business:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGM8PT1eAvY
And some are just awesomely hilarious. Try to not take yourself too seriously. Art should be for the art. I think it's somewhat presumptuous to think that anyone's self could get 50 million hits without either something truly phenomenal and universal or without the industry promoting them, especially since music is becoming more niche over time.
"Music isn't a toy" what the heck does that even mean?
I'd also think that even if you don't get too much the fact that many people enjoy your music should at least mean something... but unfortunately our economy is set up in such a way that 99.99% of artists are f**ked over... but that's more or less been the reality for untold ages.
-
- KVRist
- 356 posts since 18 Jun, 2010
Everyone has to learn this sort of thing for themselves.
The good news is that once the OP's music is finally released, he can stop speculating about what he feels SHOULD happen to his music, and start dealing with the concrete reality of what actually DOES happen with it. Until that happens, it's all speculation and philosophy.
Debating hypothetical scenarios on message boards is fine, but it's no substitute for actually putting the work out there.
Once it's released, and once it's been available in whatever channels the OP desires, THEN he can start making a meaningful, informed decision about how well it's working. And hopefully the OP, like any independent artist who sticks to their guns, will be able to accept credit for the successes they have, as well as assume responsibility for the mistakes they make.
The good news is that once the OP's music is finally released, he can stop speculating about what he feels SHOULD happen to his music, and start dealing with the concrete reality of what actually DOES happen with it. Until that happens, it's all speculation and philosophy.
Debating hypothetical scenarios on message boards is fine, but it's no substitute for actually putting the work out there.
Once it's released, and once it's been available in whatever channels the OP desires, THEN he can start making a meaningful, informed decision about how well it's working. And hopefully the OP, like any independent artist who sticks to their guns, will be able to accept credit for the successes they have, as well as assume responsibility for the mistakes they make.
-
- Banned
- 9890 posts since 14 Nov, 2006
-
- Banned
- 870 posts since 26 Sep, 2008
Leave out the downloads and only sell the cds!tedinmexico wrote:I am not sure if I should approach the market in steps, meaning that only the CD album will be made available for sale, initially, followed by download sales later.
CLOSING SALE! My samplepacks: Vintage House Stabs | Deep House Chords + Volume 2 | House Piano Chords