If we get enough positive stability reports, who knowsATN69 wrote:So is it a good guess that Helm will be the next synth for OSC89?
Did you try the latest version?
If we get enough positive stability reports, who knowsATN69 wrote:So is it a good guess that Helm will be the next synth for OSC89?
Not yet but I will. I actually never tried Helm so it will be interestingbjporter wrote:If we get enough positive stability reports, who knowsATN69 wrote:So is it a good guess that Helm will be the next synth for OSC89?
Did you try the latest version?
bjporter wrote:Did you try 0.81?Yeager wrote:0.5 , 0.6 (phones home for updates) and 0.7 (creates a folder called patches on my C drive) are very unstable on my system which is too bad because I really like what this vst can do.
32bit vst on windows 7 (64bit) in a 32 bit Host
PER plugin instance?!?!? Or is that just for the first one? It uses JUCE, I assume there's some shared GUI-sharing code that should mitigate the size after the first one is loaded.Yeager wrote:... eats a lot of ram per plug in instance...Helm about 95Mb
z.prime wrote:PER plugin instance?!?!? Or is that just for the first one? It uses JUCE, I assume there's some shared GUI-sharing code that should mitigate the size after the first one is loaded.Yeager wrote:... eats a lot of ram per plug in instance...Helm about 95Mb
Just tested in FLS 12.3 and 10 instances took it up to over 1.7GB. Other than that it looks greatYeager wrote:I know it's weird but :
Clean project : 185 MB Total
1 helm : 413MB Total
2 helm : 517MB Total
next helm : 621MB Total
next helm : 724MB Total etc...
z.prime wrote:PER plugin instance?!?!? Or is that just for the first one? It uses JUCE, I assume there's some shared GUI-sharing code that should mitigate the size after the first one is loaded.Yeager wrote:... eats a lot of ram per plug in instance...Helm about 95Mb
loudness is definitely a valid point, but there isn't an easy solution (so many opinions / measurement types, etc) except via voting. If you think a track is way to loud, maybe -1 points.bh9090 wrote:Anyone notice the latest round has some really loud tracks? I remember there used to be a requirement to post your RMS or something. Maybe we should get back to that?
Also, maybe we could consider a month where presets aren't allowed and everyone has to come up with their own sounds? It's kind of odd in a competition where sound design is a factor that people use presets and/or request them from others. I don't think a track where every sound comes from INIT should be judged equivalent to one that is just presets. Maybe a true/false if all sounds where from an INIT patch.
I don't see any but I imagine there are some out there.Darksynth FX wrote:RePro sounds nice, are there any presets out for it?
Yeah, it was mentioned. If people don't mind the massive CPU it uses, it could be a great synth.subject36 wrote:Have you talked about RePro yet?
/S36
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement