IKM SampleTank 3 (ST3) Now Available
-
- KVRian
- 1003 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Hi Again,
Updating did not make any difference, but I reverse engineered the problem looking at how the CPU meter reacted to removing effects one by one and a few of them seemed very CPU hungry - especially the convrooms. Also I could see that an empty Sampletank without instruments loaded would put 5-10 % load on the system. Quiet alot for a hexacore I´d say..
Updating did not make any difference, but I reverse engineered the problem looking at how the CPU meter reacted to removing effects one by one and a few of them seemed very CPU hungry - especially the convrooms. Also I could see that an empty Sampletank without instruments loaded would put 5-10 % load on the system. Quiet alot for a hexacore I´d say..
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Roman Empire
-
- KVRAF
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
Not seeing that here, on an old (2010) 8-core i7.
Empty ST3 = ~0.50%
ST3 + Organ instrument + ConvoRoom reverb =~0.97%
Empty ST3 = ~0.50%
ST3 + Organ instrument + ConvoRoom reverb =~0.97%
-
- KVRian
- 1003 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Good that some people are having luck then Which host are you using?DarkStar wrote:Not seeing that here, on an old (2010) 8-core i7.
Empty ST3 = ~0.50%
ST3 + Organ instrument + ConvoRoom reverb =~0.97%
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Roman Empire
-
- KVRAF
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
That was in Reaper v4.77. I've had a thought - that was Reaper 32-bit, so perhaps its performance figures do not include the bridged 64bit host .exe. But, on checking, the figures are similarly low in the Windows Resource Monitor for both processes.
-
- KVRian
- 1003 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
I guess I´ll have a look at the Windows CPU meters to see whether if they indicate a change - COULD be Cubase not telling the truth, although it´d be weird that it´s only behaving like that with ST 3 and no other plugs.
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Roman Empire
-
- KVRAF
- 2279 posts since 9 Jun, 2002 from East of Santa Monica
You could take Cubase out of the picture by running the standalone ST3. This will at least tell you if S3 is running efficiently (or not) on your system.Roman Empire wrote:I guess I´ll have a look at the Windows CPU meters to see whether if they indicate a change - COULD be Cubase not telling the truth, although it´d be weird that it´s only behaving like that with ST 3 and no other plugs.
FWIW, Standalone S3 (no instruments loaded) on my i7 2600k system uses about 0.22 % cpu according to Windows Resource Monitor. This is for the S3 process alone (Not total cpu usage).
-
- KVRian
- 1003 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Great idea, I´ll come back with the result later!flugel45 wrote:You could take Cubase out of the picture by running the standalone ST3. This will at least tell you if S3 is running efficiently (or not) on your system.Roman Empire wrote:I guess I´ll have a look at the Windows CPU meters to see whether if they indicate a change - COULD be Cubase not telling the truth, although it´d be weird that it´s only behaving like that with ST 3 and no other plugs.
FWIW, Standalone S3 (no instruments loaded) on my i7 2600k system uses about 0.22 % cpu according to Windows Resource Monitor. This is for the S3 process alone (Not total cpu usage).
Best Regards
Roman Empire
-
- KVRian
- 1003 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Alliright, as standalone there´s absolutely nothing wrong. I loaded 4 instruments with a total of 10-15 effects and got 1-2 % CPU load.
Not really sure though whether if it´s Cubase not behaving well with the ST3 dll or the other way around...
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Not really sure though whether if it´s Cubase not behaving well with the ST3 dll or the other way around...
Best Regards
Roman Empire
-
- KVRAF
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
^^^^
That finding would be well worth reporting to IK Multimedia Support.
That finding would be well worth reporting to IK Multimedia Support.
-
- KVRian
- 1003 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Absolutely. I´ll try to do a bit more testing and see what I´ll find and then liase directly to IK.DarkStar wrote:^^^^
That finding would be well worth reporting to IK Multimedia Support.
Best Regards
Roman Empire
-
Peter - IK Multimedia Peter - IK Multimedia https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=217907
- KVRAF
- 7864 posts since 20 Oct, 2009
I hope support was able to assist with the issue above.
By the way, this isn't the only big news coming soon for SampleTank 3:
https://soundcloud.com/ikmultimedia/st3 ... tic-drama1
By the way, this isn't the only big news coming soon for SampleTank 3:
https://soundcloud.com/ikmultimedia/st3 ... tic-drama1
- KVRAF
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Why does Studio One 3 Prime (which is free) require a license?electro wrote:Why does ST3 free require a license?
-
- KVRist
- 334 posts since 4 Sep, 2014
Wow sounds awesome Maybe a epic cinematic strings collection is next?Peter - IK Multimedia wrote:I hope support was able to assist with the issue above.
By the way, this isn't the only big news coming soon for SampleTank 3:
https://soundcloud.com/ikmultimedia/st3 ... tic-drama1
-
- KVRAF
- 9133 posts since 6 Oct, 2004
Having an account will save you time when you decide to make a purchase,electro wrote:Why does ST3 free require a license?
and help with updates, and future activations, as when you buy a new computer,
or when issues causing OS reinstallations use up the standard allotment
of activations. It will also help support staff track and communicate about
issues unique to your systems.
There is value in a free version, and value in it's makers keeping track of it.
Cheers