FL Studio 2024 (nee FL Studio 21.3)
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 543 posts since 30 May, 2019
The DAW, formerly known as "FL Studio 21", is apparently going to be rebranded as "FL Studio 2024" for its next upcoming release (currently undergoing public beta testing).
Previously, this beta had been referred to publicly as "v21.3 beta x", ... but as of the current "v21.3 beta 3", Image-Line have apparently decided to refer to this as the "FL Studio 2024.1 Beta" instead.
Any thoughts about the new version scheme and FL Studio being retitled to "FL Studio 2024", "FL Studio 2025", etc. going forwards?
Do users feel positive, negative, or indifferent to this change?
Is this all just a marketing ploy to attract more attention, or is it beneficial and more obvious for customers to recognise which is the latest up-to-date release?
With FL Studio's "Lifetime Free Updates", perhaps this is less of an issue, since existing licence-holders will always get free updates, whenever they're released, regardless of their major or minor status.
But, could this same "annual titling" format be adopted by the other rival DAW developers, such as "Ableton Live 2025", "Studio 2025", and "Cubase 2025?" Or would that be silly?
(no doubt, they'd probably try to monetize any such a change, for more regular annual 'paid/major' updates')
Previously, this beta had been referred to publicly as "v21.3 beta x", ... but as of the current "v21.3 beta 3", Image-Line have apparently decided to refer to this as the "FL Studio 2024.1 Beta" instead.
Any thoughts about the new version scheme and FL Studio being retitled to "FL Studio 2024", "FL Studio 2025", etc. going forwards?
Do users feel positive, negative, or indifferent to this change?
Is this all just a marketing ploy to attract more attention, or is it beneficial and more obvious for customers to recognise which is the latest up-to-date release?
With FL Studio's "Lifetime Free Updates", perhaps this is less of an issue, since existing licence-holders will always get free updates, whenever they're released, regardless of their major or minor status.
But, could this same "annual titling" format be adopted by the other rival DAW developers, such as "Ableton Live 2025", "Studio 2025", and "Cubase 2025?" Or would that be silly?
(no doubt, they'd probably try to monetize any such a change, for more regular annual 'paid/major' updates')
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 1608 posts since 27 Apr, 2012
Yeah sure whatever. Like you said it's not like their versioning scheme really matters. It does seem like it makes it a little unclear when a major update happens but
Softsynth addict and electronic music enthusiast.
"Destruction is the work of an afternoon. Creation is the work of a lifetime."
"Destruction is the work of an afternoon. Creation is the work of a lifetime."
- KVRAF
- 11529 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
-
- KVRian
- 983 posts since 22 Apr, 2004 from Switzerland
A major update could be FL Studio 2024, FL Studio 2027, etc. It doesn't mean there has to be a FL Studio 2025 or FL Studio 2026.Greenstorm33 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:47 pm Yeah sure whatever. Like you said it's not like their versioning scheme really matters. It does seem like it makes it a little unclear when a major update happens but
I guess, if you do them by year/month, it is easier for users to know how old their version is and when the last version was released?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 543 posts since 30 May, 2019
I think that's probably more the thinking behind this.Blaster wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:06 pmA major update could be FL Studio 2024, FL Studio 2027, etc. It doesn't mean there has to be a FL Studio 2025 or FL Studio 2026.Greenstorm33 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:47 pm Yeah sure whatever. Like you said it's not like their versioning scheme really matters. It does seem like it makes it a little unclear when a major update happens but
I guess, if you do them by year/month, it is easier for users to know how old their version is and when the last version was released?
That, along with perhaps also some marketing execs, wanting to clearer communicate the fact that this DAW is regularly updated.
i.e. they may believe version "21" sounded like it hasn't had much improvement in three years, to anyone mistaking that number for the year "2021"
(perhaps when marketing to potential new customers, from the same crowd as those who also regularly buy video games like FIFA 22, FIFA 23, etc., each year?)
Probably not most of the users on KVR forum. But those you'd find on other social media, that attract a younger demographic.
Last edited by MrJubbly on Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 1608 posts since 27 Apr, 2012
They seem to be calling a .x update "2024" and conceivably you could have two or more .x updates, or a .x update and a major version update, in one year so I'm not sure what they're going to do then.Blaster wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:06 pmA major update could be FL Studio 2024, FL Studio 2027, etc. It doesn't mean there has to be a FL Studio 2025 or FL Studio 2026.Greenstorm33 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:47 pm Yeah sure whatever. Like you said it's not like their versioning scheme really matters. It does seem like it makes it a little unclear when a major update happens but
I guess, if you do them by year/month, it is easier for users to know how old their version is and when the last version was released?
Edit: I see, they're just tacking on a .1 (2024.1). Still seems to preclude distinguishing between what would have been a major update and what would have been a point update but I'm not sure that distinction actually matters much now.
Softsynth addict and electronic music enthusiast.
"Destruction is the work of an afternoon. Creation is the work of a lifetime."
"Destruction is the work of an afternoon. Creation is the work of a lifetime."
- KVRian
- 1389 posts since 17 Jul, 2007 from Riversland Valhalla
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 543 posts since 30 May, 2019
Sheer volume of sales?
Also, they did just recently introduce their separate "FL Cloud" subscription service.
So likely, they will continue to add services to that, to ensure a regular revenue stream, from subscribers ... of which, there are possibly a LOT, and potentially many more existing customers to sign up. Given, how popular the DAW is.
- KVRist
- 112 posts since 24 Feb, 2008 from Germany
New customers still pays. And old customers buys periphery like hardware and software and sample packs. And we have a paid cloud now. So they get their bills and developers paid.
-
- KVRAF
- 35650 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Something I wonder with a lot of companies in this business. Bitwig, for example. How many years has it been in development? How do you bridge such periods of literally no income? Puzzles me.
-
- KVRAF
- 11545 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from North Wales
https://synthanatomy.com/2023/04/image- ... loper.html
Must be doing well enough!
Bitwig has regular income with the 'update plan', no idea how image line does so well, must have a lot of new people constantly buying in I guess....people like me who buy it in a sale and then rarely use it (and there is no way to sell it, so no second hand market).
Must be doing well enough!
Bitwig has regular income with the 'update plan', no idea how image line does so well, must have a lot of new people constantly buying in I guess....people like me who buy it in a sale and then rarely use it (and there is no way to sell it, so no second hand market).
X32 Desk, i9 PC, S49MK2, S1, BWS, Live . PUSH 3 SA, Osmose, Summit, Pro3, Prophet8, Syntakt, Digitone, Drumlogue, OP1-F, MPC Live II, Tracker Mini, Eurorack, TD27 Drums, Nord Drum3P, Guitars, Basses, Amps and of course lots of pedals!