OT: Perseid visibility (sp?)
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 346 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from Sydney, Ausralia
Since I can't find a straight answer to this question on any Google search, somebody here might know -- is the Perseid meteor shower visible from East Coast Australia, and if so, when?
Thanks,
G.
Thanks,
G.
-
- Banned
- 6127 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Et in Arcadia Ego
At its peak around the nights of Aug. 11 and 12, the shower can
produce 50 to 100 fast, bright meteors per hour for any observer with
a wide-open view of a dark sky.
produce 50 to 100 fast, bright meteors per hour for any observer with
a wide-open view of a dark sky.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 346 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from Sydney, Ausralia
OK ... I was thinking of taking some long-exposure photographs (real film!), so does it matter what direction I point the camera in?sickle666 wrote:At its peak around the nights of Aug. 11 and 12, the shower can
produce 50 to 100 fast, bright meteors per hour for any observer with
a wide-open view of a dark sky.
Thanks,
G.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105988 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
Gwydi wrote:OK ... I was thinking of taking some long-exposure photographs (real film!), so does it matter what direction I point the camera in?sickle666 wrote:At its peak around the nights of Aug. 11 and 12, the shower can
produce 50 to 100 fast, bright meteors per hour for any observer with
a wide-open view of a dark sky.
Thanks,
G.
up not down preferably
-
- Banned
- 6127 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Et in Arcadia Ego
Since it's called the Persieds, it's radiant point of origin is the Perseus constellation. That means more or less most trails will have that as the common source, but it will not apply to every single one of them, just most.
If you are unable to see that constellation in your hemisphere, just point your lense at the Zenith, & maybe try pointing into the east as well, but make sure you are using as slow a focal lense as possible (28mm or less)
Keep in mind that once you drop below 16mm, you are gonna pick up things in the fisheye like the tripod.
If your camera has a timed shutter release, use that with a cable, so the stability is beter.
The old Nikon F1, 2, & 3 cameras are ideal for this.
AS well as an Olympus M-1 or 2
If you are unable to see that constellation in your hemisphere, just point your lense at the Zenith, & maybe try pointing into the east as well, but make sure you are using as slow a focal lense as possible (28mm or less)
Keep in mind that once you drop below 16mm, you are gonna pick up things in the fisheye like the tripod.
If your camera has a timed shutter release, use that with a cable, so the stability is beter.
The old Nikon F1, 2, & 3 cameras are ideal for this.
AS well as an Olympus M-1 or 2
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
Meteor showers are visible all over the planet, wherever it's dark and clear. You'll see more meteors after midnight, when you're on the side of the Earth moving into the stream of cometary debris.
You should point your camera in the direction of the radiant, which is in the constellation Perseus. That's in the northern sky, possibly near or below your horizon. The radiant is the point in the sky from which the meteors seem to fan out (it's really where you're looking straight into the center of the stream of oncoming bits of stuff). Don't worry if you can't see the radiant itself, meteors will trace outward from that point so you should still see plenty of sparkle.
For long exposures, be sure to have a dark sky so your background won't get washed out. A wide-angle lens would be very helpful here, the wider the better.
Best of luck!
Meffy
You should point your camera in the direction of the radiant, which is in the constellation Perseus. That's in the northern sky, possibly near or below your horizon. The radiant is the point in the sky from which the meteors seem to fan out (it's really where you're looking straight into the center of the stream of oncoming bits of stuff). Don't worry if you can't see the radiant itself, meteors will trace outward from that point so you should still see plenty of sparkle.
For long exposures, be sure to have a dark sky so your background won't get washed out. A wide-angle lens would be very helpful here, the wider the better.
Best of luck!
Meffy
-
- Banned
- 6127 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Et in Arcadia Ego
One other thing you can try:Gwydi wrote:OK ... I was thinking of taking some long-exposure photographs (real film!), so does it matter what direction I point the camera in?sickle666 wrote:At its peak around the nights of Aug. 11 and 12, the shower can
produce 50 to 100 fast, bright meteors per hour for any observer with
a wide-open view of a dark sky.
Thanks,
G.
Find Polar south & aim at that, so your star trails are revolving around it in a really long exposure, but make sure you reduce your apeture settings unless you wanna blow out the image in light saturation.
I recommend getting a couple of 'dry runs' in before you do it, so you don't make the metoer shower a practice session. Write down the settings you use for each shot & compare them all when you get the film developed.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 346 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from Sydney, Ausralia
I did some star trail photographs last year that worked out reasonably well considering I live in suburbia and therefore can only dream of dark skies. I don't have a fancy camera or lenses but I do have a shutter cable. I could scan some of the photos if you want to see the results I got .. ?
Unfortunately, Polar south happens to be in the direction of some fairly bright terrestrial light sources and they blow the film out in a matter of minutes. However, if I drive to the beach I've got a completely unobscured, completely dark, Eastern horizon
G.
Unfortunately, Polar south happens to be in the direction of some fairly bright terrestrial light sources and they blow the film out in a matter of minutes. However, if I drive to the beach I've got a completely unobscured, completely dark, Eastern horizon
G.
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
Yes! Essential for all sky photography. All photography of any sort, IMO... but particularly sky.sickle666 wrote:Write down the settings you use for each shot & compare them all when you get the film developed.
Meffy
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105988 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
Gwydi wrote:. I could scan some of the photos if you want to see the results I got .. ?
G.
but of course
-
- KVRAF
- 7936 posts since 18 Feb, 2003 from out there somewhere
not really sky tho is it?Meffy wrote:Yes! Essential for all sky photography. All photography of any sort, IMO... but particularly sky.sickle666 wrote:Write down the settings you use for each shot & compare them all when you get the film developed.
Meffy
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 346 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from Sydney, Ausralia
Here ya go .. the photos are not in great condition, but it's a fair indication of the results I can get from around my house.vurt wrote:but of courseGwydi wrote:. I could scan some of the photos if you want to see the results I got .. ?
G.
Nice and clean:
The streak down the right-hand side really is there on the photo, at first I thought it was a hair on the scanner. Not sure what it is ... ?
Hey, who said that plane could fly across my picture?
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
Oh, sure. Sky photography includes more than photos of deep space objects and solar-system bodies. It also includes meteors (which are neither fish nor fowl, being on their way from space to Earth); clouds, storms, tornadoes, fronts, and lightning; sunsets and sunrises; rainbows; solar and lunar halos, sundogs, sun-pillars, circumsolar arcs, and related refractive phenomena... all sorts of stuff.CypherOne wrote:not really sky tho is it?
For many purposes it can be thought of as a distinct sub-discipline of photography. This makes sense because the nature of what you're concentrating on is so different (a light emitter instead of reflector) from the usual subjects.
Meffy
-
- Banned
- 6127 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Et in Arcadia Ego
That streak is probably a satellite. It looks like one of the Irridiums they put up about 8 years ago. They are spaced in orbit equidistantly & typically mar everyone's photos
The changes in the streak are the satellite's rotation, which is pretty fast. On almost any given day, right after the sun sets you can usually see one if you spend a minute looking between the meridian & the western sky as the last light from the sun hits em.
either that or it's a UFO & that pic is worth millions..
The changes in the streak are the satellite's rotation, which is pretty fast. On almost any given day, right after the sun sets you can usually see one if you spend a minute looking between the meridian & the western sky as the last light from the sun hits em.
either that or it's a UFO & that pic is worth millions..