^^^ are we talking about the same programTrancit wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 2:08 pmSomething like Rapid Composer immediately makes me despair and creates in me a strong urge to throw the computer out of the window and join a monastery.xbitz wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 1:03 pmRapidComposer (https://www.musicdevelopments.com/rc.html light version is enough) has all the chord related features so not so easy to drop out BWS just because of this and BWS supports Push (which has also has a very nice chord sequencer thx for Moss ) what is missing from both AL/BWS that's the MIDI orchestration related features (articulation handling etc.) at least AL has http://www.computermusicnotation.com/#Maxscore :"MaxScore provides music notation in Max and Ableton Live! Now with support for Arrangement Clips and MPE!"Trancit wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:18 pm ...
I more of a trancy guy... for me the most what matters are chords...their creating, handling and mangling... this is i.e. where FLS shines like the brightest star in the sky with it´s easy auditioning, it´s stamp tool, the chop, the arpeggiate, articulate and groove quantizing...respectively that everything is highly user customizeable via user defineable patterns (which no other DAW offers to this extend)...
...
When I try to handle these programms they must be named "Very Very Slow Composer with tears in his eyes"
People liking something like this must have a different type of understanding or are simply very masochistically inclined....
dunno how it could be faster (not for composing, but prototyping)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6PthfeiuMM
scale, voicing, playing with ghosted generators and done can go to the host (even faster if play only with chord generator and some arp like Blue in the host instead)
