What about an orgy?Fundy wrote:Yeah wait till next week when I'm fulling explaining the schematics of a triode tube system....No seriously, I did reference this afterwards. What I can tell you though is, a valve amp is not suitable for a pool party.
Generally, what do you think is the 'best' sounding EQ?
- KVRAF
- 19134 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
-
- KVRer
- 18 posts since 16 Apr, 2004
hi daniel,ddummer wrote:oohh oooh... gotta show:
Nice placebo... or is it?
//Daniel
seems to be the same i saw inserted in your energy-xt skin ...
http://www.tinbrooketales.com/hosted/Humble_Red1.png
greetz cro
-
- KVRist
- 257 posts since 18 Dec, 2004
Tubes do get much hotter after pushing them - exactly what happens with power tubes in instrument amps, eg. bassman etc. or transmitters.Kingston wrote:That's not how tubes work at all. They don't get hotter after the warm up period, and they certainly will not flash like in the idiotic misguided plugin interfaces we see around! You can saturate them, yes, but it will not affect the tubes physically. They barely even glow! hip hip hooray for back lights invented by marketing departments!Fundy wrote:The term "hot" also comes from the fact, the harder you worked the valves the hotter they got.
no really, the words "analog" and "warmth" are blanket terms for whatever people think or (more precisely) believe is the ideal sound, and hence they mean absolutely nothing. The same applies to "hot" or "cold".
The sooner an engineer understands this, the better he becomes with the craft.
Doesnt happen in pres and effects (and receivers).
-
JumpingJackFlash JumpingJackFlash https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=44005
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1227 posts since 10 Oct, 2004
I agree that the best free stuff is often better than the worst payware stuff. - And that's great of course, people who give good stuff away are amazing. However, the purpose here is to find the "best" payware EQ. - Now, I may be wrong, but I would think that the "best" payware stuff is going to be better than any free stuff. - I have no facts to back that up, but, lets face it, someone would have to be fairly silly to give away something which they could easily make hundreds from. - I want to find the ultimate EQ here (glossing over for the moment the fact that such a thing may not exist).Kingston wrote:indeed. this poll is completely useless and skewed in so many ways it's not even funny.shamann wrote:And if a free EQ sounds better than a commercial EQ, do you really need to buy one?
what's the point of knowing the average joes opinion on best commercial EQ when it's either equal or can't touch the quality of the free ones?
If I included the freebies, many people would undoubtedly vote for them. - Perhaps because they are new to audio production, or are just amateurs who haven't had experience of the payware EQ's. - Or possibly, because the fact that they're free skews people's opinions; they think it's so good that they're getting something for nothing, that they want the developer to be praised an brought to other people's attention.
The best thing would be to have a separate poll; "what is the best FREE EQ?". Then, possibly, a third could be done, combining the most popular from each category. - That's for another time though.
I hope I haven't insulted anyone btw; read my first sentence again, I do believe that a lot of free stuff is very good, and I genuinely respect the people who develop it.
- KVRAF
- 19134 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
-
Zaphod (giancarlo) Zaphod (giancarlo) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=111268
- KVRAF
- 2596 posts since 23 Jun, 2006
agreed. In general, in my opinion this is true. Let's make an example. If the new company xxx produces something better than other payware/freewares in general they'll release 2 versions: a free one (light cost or free) and a commercial one.JumpingJackFlash wrote: Now, I may be wrong, but I would think that the "best" payware stuff is going to be better than any free stuff.
We are speaking here not only about "sound quality", but also about " freatures"
Let's make an example. Budde released a free eq; probably it is better than other plugs, but he released a commercial version too.
I think the engine has the same quality, but electric-q has a lot more features than the free version.
I know someone releases ONLY free stuff. Good stuff. But, ehi, support has a cost. You can't release something free with a good customer support for a long time, because the time spent on developement is just a fraction of the time required by mails/debug/support.
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
With stuff like nyquist, voxengo GEQ and electri-q posihfopit around? no, you are quite wrong with that line of thought.JumpingJackFlash wrote:Now, I may be wrong, but I would think that the "best" payware stuff is going to be better than any free stuff.
like I said, this poll is useless.
-
Zaphod (giancarlo) Zaphod (giancarlo) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=111268
- KVRAF
- 2596 posts since 23 Jun, 2006
imho true if you say "all commercial products" are better than "all free products". But for every every company/developer "commercial products" will be always better than "released free stuff"Kingston wrote: With stuff like nyquist, voxengo GEQ and electri-q posihfopit around? no, you are quite wrong with that line of thought.
So limiting research to "commercial products" has a sense for me and for him!
agreed, but for polls in general and in my opinion a "perfect" tool for everyone doesn't exist. I don't think the "average" product (because a lot of producers love it) is the bestKingston wrote: this poll is useless.
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
ehh. What?Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:But for every every company/developer "commercial products" will be always better than "released free stuff"
There are pretty much no producers on KVR. here we get the opinion of the average joe who has a cheap software based system, barely qualified as DAW with audigy, and headphones as "main monitoring".Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:agreed, but for polls in general and in my opinion a "perfect" tool for everyone doesn't exist. I don't think the "average" product (because a lot of producers love it) is the bestKingston wrote: this poll is useless.
-
- KVRist
- 70 posts since 13 Oct, 2006
No reason for this post, I just felt like quoting you.Kingston wrote:ehh. What?Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:But for every every company/developer "commercial products" will be always better than "released free stuff"
There are pretty much no producers on KVR. here we get the opinion of the average joe who has a cheap software based system, barely qualified as DAW with audigy, and headphones as "main monitoring".Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:agreed, but for polls in general and in my opinion a "perfect" tool for everyone doesn't exist. I don't think the "average" product (because a lot of producers love it) is the bestKingston wrote: this poll is useless.
-
- KVRAF
- 4007 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
Er, Yeah. Totally trueKingston wrote:There are pretty much no producers on KVR. here we get the opinion of the average joe who has a cheap software based system, barely qualified as DAW with audigy, and headphones as "main monitoring".
No.
I make music: progressive-acoustic | electronica/game-soundtrack work | progressive alt-metal
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
-
Richard Lichten Richard Lichten https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=115283
- KVRist
- 316 posts since 4 Aug, 2006 from nowhere, really
Partly true IMO - there are some really skilled peole here.
-
- KVRist
- 385 posts since 2 Mar, 2003 from UK
If it's your believe that you must pay for something for it to be good then thats utter nonsense and full of delusion! I have to agree with Kingston that the better EQ's aren't even here....nyquist, voxengo GEQ, electri-q posihfopit...damn good ITB EQ's...and all free! Think of it this way...if someone gave you a free hardware EQ wouldn't you use your ears and judge first before going out and buying hardware EQ if you thought you needed to?..poor example but still. To go off subject completely I've had enough of doing things completly in the box anyway and started buying my hardware back!!!
Cheers.
Cheers.
-
Zaphod (giancarlo) Zaphod (giancarlo) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=111268
- KVRAF
- 2596 posts since 23 Jun, 2006
Kingston wrote:ehh. What?"
My example:
Company 1: free "A" and commercial "B"
Company 2: free "A2" and commercial "B2"
I suppose that "B" will be better than "A" and "B2" will be better than "A2" (absolutely true, you sell a thing only if it is better or equal)
in this case, even if "A" is better than "B2", the collection {"B", "B2"} contains the best element "B"
If you are looking for the best element, a good strategy could be "compare commercial tools"
Ok today I love jokes
agreed. There are producers, but they don't post. I don't know the reason. And yes, the common software developer has phones and cheap card. Again, I don't know the reason. Not only: the average developer doesn't use ears, only the head (and the eyes ).Kingston wrote:There are pretty much no producers on KVR. here we get the opinion of the average joe who has a cheap software based system, barely qualified as DAW with audigy, and headphones as "main monitoring".