noel?
Is talent born or created with hard work and practice
-
- addled muppet weed
- 106349 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- addled muppet weed
- 106349 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
- KVRAF
- 25053 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
-
- KVRAF
- 15533 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Frank would know.
- KVRAF
- 3608 posts since 12 Jan, 2019
It's true--but you still get to consider it shitty, from your perspective, when you hear it that way.
Doing nothing is only fun when you have something you are supposed to do.
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 12850 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
- KVRAF
- 3608 posts since 12 Jan, 2019
For sure.
Doing nothing is only fun when you have something you are supposed to do.
- KVRian
- 607 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
Who would you say is more popular, Yngwie Malmsteen or Iggy Pop? Let's not kid ourselves with the answer. I'll go as far as saying Iggy is a legend of rock n roll. He made an absolute mark.
Guess what? The man has never done an arena tour as a headliner.
So no, it's not an argument about popularity. Just because someone may be popular, or in Iggy's case, famous, doesn't mean his music connects with many people.
For whatever reason, Rising Force made a much bigger impact as far as connecting with a large audience yet go ask people what they think of Yngwie and most will have no idea who the f**k you're talking about.
donkey tugger wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:28 am [url=<span class="skimlinks-unlinked">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism</span>/]Knock yerselves out..[/url]
Unbelievable. All the years of debating relativism by so called intelligent theorists and philosophers dating back to Plato and *I* have to be the one to set it all straight???And yet, despite a long history of debate going back to Plato and an increasingly large body of writing, it is still difficult to come to an agreed definition of what, at its core, relativism is, and what philosophical import it has
Alrighty then! So be it.
Relativism is nothing more than necessary potential difference for dispersment which conjurs life as we know it.
What if everybody was attracted ro living in the Bahamas?
What if everybody was attracted to being a doctor?
What if everybody was attracted to the color red?
God forbid what if everybody was attracted to the same chord progeession?
Art, as we know it, would cease ro exist. Life as we know it wouldn't be vivid because there's no diversity which means no threat as well.
Every man's pleasure is the same and that means no pleasure because how would we know it without difference?
Everything is relative because without it there would be no attraction to move in different directions.
Of course that brings up something else quite unpleasant......fate.
What you are attracted to has been given before birth. It is fate that makes you like what you like.
See how easy that is? And all those idiots wasting time bickering and being pedantic about nonsense when they could've used that time to drink barrells of whiskey.
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 12850 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
What a load of old bollocks.VOODOO U wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 7:13 pmWho would you say is more popular, Yngwie Malmsteen or Iggy Pop? Let's not kid ourselves with the answer. I'll go as far as saying Iggy is a legend of rock n roll. He made an absolute mark.
Guess what? The man has never done an arena tour as a headliner.
So no, it's not an argument about popularity. Just because someone may be popular, or in Iggy's case, famous, doesn't mean his music connects with many people.
For whatever reason, Rising Force made a much bigger impact as far as connecting with a large audience yet go ask people what they think of Yngwie and most will have no idea who the f**k you're talking about.
donkey tugger wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:28 am [url=<span class="skimlinks-unlinked">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism</span>/]Knock yerselves out..[/url]Unbelievable. All the years of debating relativism by so called intelligent theorists and philosophers dating back to Plato and *I* have to be the one to set it all straight???And yet, despite a long history of debate going back to Plato and an increasingly large body of writing, it is still difficult to come to an agreed definition of what, at its core, relativism is, and what philosophical import it has
Alrighty then! So be it.
Relativism is nothing more than necessary potential difference for dispersment which conjurs life as we know it.
What if everybody was attracted ro living in the Bahamas?
What if everybody was attracted to being a doctor?
What if everybody was attracted to the color red?
God forbid what if everybody was attracted to the same chord progeession?
Art, as we know it, would cease ro exist. Life as we know it wouldn't be vivid because there's no diversity which means no threat as well.
Every man's pleasure is the same and that means no pleasure because how would we know it without difference?
Everything is relative because without it there would be no attraction to move in different directions.
Of course that brings up something else quite unpleasant......fate.
What you are attracted to has been given before birth. It is fate that makes you like what you like.
See how easy that is? And all those idiots wasting time bickering and being pedantic about nonsense when they could've used that time to drink barrells of whiskey.
See how easy that was?
- Beware the Quoth
- 33347 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
meh.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 12850 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Beware the Quoth
- 33347 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
looks itchy.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand