jens wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:02 am No, for recording MIDI and audio too. I have used eXT/XT2 for a few years and I didn't "paint MIDI", drums aside, and it really is super-fast too work with.
It's just that there isn't really support for take-recording and such in XT2
(there was in eXT 1.4 however - for me for working with audio eXT in a way surpassed everything else out there - no other DAW has the same kind of superb functionality (audio parts being containers for an arbitrary number of independent take-lanes - you could basically record, edit and arrange a whole song inside a single audio-part))
Anyway: ictools, do you know what I am talking about? Are you actually familiar with XT2 or just stirring the pot again, as per usual? (I must admit that your trolling is really good as one can almost never quite tell if you're actually trolling or really a lunatic)
It was mostly referring to FL Studio, since that's what people actually use. I don't think most people even know about or have heard of XT2. And both aren't faster at recording, that's for sure. Most people that use those types of (digital sequencers) "DAWs", are painting midi anyways.codec_spurt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:47 pm
Still, nothing on earth is as lightning fast as XT2 and FLStudio when you're getting ideas down and in the grip of render mania!
You can't get much faster then hitting record and playing, when "getting ideas down".