Who is better the Beatles or Led Zeppelin
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 15 posts since 1 Feb, 2019
What do you think
- KVRAF
- 5094 posts since 16 May, 2002 from Brisbane , Australia
It's not even a question IMO.
Intel Core i7 8700K, 16gb, Windows 10 Pro, Focusrite Scarlet 6i6
- KVRAF
- 15650 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
How to compare? Better in which aspect?
The public vote (fairly easy to measure through the sales figures) probably goes to The Beatles.
The public vote (fairly easy to measure through the sales figures) probably goes to The Beatles.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRAF
- 15701 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Clearly the Beatles were the more original of the two bands in terms of composition. Led Zeppelin was, IMO, a MUCH better performing band. I find ZEP's plagiarism, and yes I think that it was that despite what the courts ruled or what was settled out of court, was definitely shady and labels them in a negative light.
- KVRAF
- 35616 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
- KVRAF
- 10913 posts since 31 Aug, 2013
I dunno about the performance thing. Clearly, Zep were better musicians, but live they could be pretty bad. I've heard some early Beatles recordings, before the girls' screaming began to drown them out, and they're pretty tight. They had charisma, and 2 of the best lead singers in the business. Listening to Plant as the sole voice in Zep started to grate on me. And yeah, my opinion of Zep has dimmed over the years due to the obviously rampant plagiarism. I know who I prefer to listen to. I saw Beatlemania through the eyes of a child, and so it is wrapped up inextricably with childhood nostalgia.ghettosynth wrote: ↑Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:34 am Clearly the Beatles were the more original of the two bands in terms of composition. Led Zeppelin was, IMO, a MUCH better performing band. I find ZEP's plagiarism, and yes I think that it was that despite what the courts ruled or what was settled out of court, was definitely shady and labels them in a negative light.
To me, there's The Beatles and then there's everyone else. The only band that I think challenged them in terms of pushing boundaries and creativity while maintaining a high level of popularity is Pink Floyd.
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 13778 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
- KVRian
- 642 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
Definitely Led Zeppelin.
The Beatles were a great and very influential band, but if you'd ask me to whom I listen to more on a regular basis, it's definitely Led Zep by a long shot.
The Beatles were a great and very influential band, but if you'd ask me to whom I listen to more on a regular basis, it's definitely Led Zep by a long shot.
- KVRAF
- 15650 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
Can you redo the topic with a poll?
Please do include the mandatory "Fish" option!
Please do include the mandatory "Fish" option!
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
- KVRAF
- 35616 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
No because I hate Marillion
(Even more than I hate The Beatles)
Last edited by aMUSEd on Wed Feb 13, 2019 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 15701 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
I think that you're a little older than I am, it seems to make a difference. Don't get me wrong, I have immense respect for the Beatles, but I don't very often want to listen to them and I have no connection at all to Beatlemania.Bombadil wrote: ↑Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:43 amI dunno about the performance thing. Clearly, Zep were better musicians, but live they could be pretty bad. I've heard some early Beatles recordings, before the girls' screaming began to drown them out, and they're pretty tight. They had charisma, and 2 of the best lead singers in the business. Listening to Plant as the sole voice in Zep started to grate on me. And yeah, my opinion of Zep has dimmed over the years due to the obviously rampant plagiarism. I know who I prefer to listen to. I saw Beatlemania through the eyes of a child, and so it is wrapped up inextricably with childhood nostalgia.ghettosynth wrote: ↑Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:34 am Clearly the Beatles were the more original of the two bands in terms of composition. Led Zeppelin was, IMO, a MUCH better performing band. I find ZEP's plagiarism, and yes I think that it was that despite what the courts ruled or what was settled out of court, was definitely shady and labels them in a negative light.
To me, there's The Beatles and then there's everyone else. The only band that I think challenged them in terms of pushing boundaries and creativity while maintaining a high level of popularity is Pink Floyd.
Q: That said, the question is ill posed for me anyway. Who would you rather listen do, Led Zep, or the Beatles.
A: Talk Talk, or any number of other bands that came later.
Last edited by ghettosynth on Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 2547 posts since 28 Mar, 2007
Which is better apples or oranges ?
Blue or red ?
I can think of numerous Beatles songs, including many number ones, but only two Led Zep songs, and one of those was plagiarized.
Led Zep has a very narrow appeal, whereas the Beatles at the time drew in mass appeal across the generations.
On KVR, anything with the word "Beatles" always ends up getting locked.
Blue or red ?
I can think of numerous Beatles songs, including many number ones, but only two Led Zep songs, and one of those was plagiarized.
Led Zep has a very narrow appeal, whereas the Beatles at the time drew in mass appeal across the generations.
On KVR, anything with the word "Beatles" always ends up getting locked.
- KVRAF
- 7672 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
I love them both. It's really too tough of choice for me!
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali