Your host doesn't save presets? Or doesn't save presets that have a VST in them? Either way... yikes. Not sure I would call that a luxery but a very basic function. Never heard of a host that can't save a preset with a VST in it.
Native Instruments Massive X Synth - Sequel to Massive (Out Now!)
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 11054 posts since 12 May, 2008
-
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 12 Jul, 2004
guys, so Massive X will out or no?
VST & Hardware presets, FL Studio templates, samples and MIDI from NatLife & friends -www.natlifesounds.com
-
- KVRian
- 1226 posts since 26 Feb, 2016
Not released yet, the elves are still baking the cookies...
-
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 12 Jul, 2004
hol yeah
VST & Hardware presets, FL Studio templates, samples and MIDI from NatLife & friends -www.natlifesounds.com
- GRRRRRRR!
- 15967 posts since 14 Jun, 2001 from Somewhere else, on principle
You have absolutely no idea. When I was finished with mine, in 1986, I literally couldn't give them away, nobody at all wanted them. A couple of years later I was about to throw them out when a friend said he'd take one, just to muck around with. The other one went to landfill. That's how good they were.
What would a host-level preset save? I can save instrument and effect presets in Orion's own preset format but I can't access those presets until I load the instrument or effect they belong to. i.e. I can choose Insert|VST instrument|Korg|Polysix but then I have to wait for it to load before I can open a preset from the instrument's toolbar. With Orion's Sampler and Drumrack, I can choose Insert|Sampler|Biting Dogs Pad (or any other preset) straight from the drop-down menu.
NOVAkILL : Asus RoG Flow Z13, Core i9, 16GB RAM, Win11 | EVO 16 | Studio One | bx_oberhausen, GR-8, JP6K, Union, Hexeract, Olga, TRK-01, SEM, BA-1, Thorn, Prestige, Spire, Legend-HZ, ANA-2, VG Iron 2 | Uno Pro, Rocket.
-
- Banned
- 658 posts since 4 Oct, 2018
It seems you have absolutely no idea.BONES wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:58 amYou have absolutely no idea. When I was finished with mine, in 1986, I literally couldn't give them away, nobody at all wanted them. A couple of years later I was about to throw them out when a friend said he'd take one, just to muck around with. The other one went to landfill. That's how good they were.
Please don't bother to fight back, as you love to. I'm not into petty fights with clueless twats.
-
- KVRian
- 969 posts since 5 Sep, 2014 from Heaven
Hmm when you read 'low pass' it could just as logically be understood to mean something that passes the lows; something that leaves the lows intact; something that does not touch the lows. So a 'low pass filter' would be a filter that does not interact with the lows. So maybe it was Bob Moog's way of describing the complex behaviour the particular filter he had and every other filter since that has actually filtered away the lows completely has been using 'low-pass' incorrectly. Maybe Bob wanted it to to be that way. Maybe he's been giggling about it for decades and not saying anything. Maybe he's still giggling.
In any case BONES you definitely are objectively terrible.
M O N O S Y N T H S F O R E V E R
-
- Banned
- 658 posts since 4 Oct, 2018
From a philosophical point of view, and strictly speaking, NOTHING is objective. Everything is how it appears to you. So if you see a ball and say 'this is a ball', this is subjective. If you measure a frequency of 1 kHz with your spectroscope, this is not objective either.spunkmuffin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:42 am In any case BONES you definitely are objectively terrible.
You guys should really read up on ancient Greek philosophy, before posting around on music forums. This would save the discussion from derailing into error, sin and the realm of Satan (yes, Christianity is about that too).
- KVRAF
- 23103 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Of course he couldn't do without ad hominem.
- KVRAF
- 4590 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
Talking about philosophy... I just realized how pointless and irrelevant my life is if I spend time reading these discussions on KVR :v
Even if everything is subjective, you guys could stick to subject, still.
Even if everything is subjective, you guys could stick to subject, still.
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
- KVRAF
- 1959 posts since 21 Sep, 2007 from The Infinite Void
From a scientific point of view, there absolutely is such a thing as objective. The qualities of a ball that determine its nature are objective, the only thing subjective is the purpose that you imbue upon it. Perhaps you should read some more recent scientific literature before posting philosophy on a computer software forum.perfumer wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:53 amFrom a philosophical point of view, and strictly speaking, NOTHING is objective. Everything is how it appears to you. So if you see a ball and say 'this is a ball', this is subjective. If you measure a frequency of 1 kHz with your spectroscope, this is not objective either.spunkmuffin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:42 am In any case BONES you definitely are objectively terrible.
You guys should really read up on ancient Greek philosophy, before posting around on music forums. This would save the discussion from derailing into error, sin and the realm of Satan (yes, Christianity is about that too).
-
- Banned
- 658 posts since 4 Oct, 2018
No, they are not, because that's how they appear to you.mutantdog wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:17 amFrom a scientific point of view, there absolutely is such a thing as objective. The qualities of a ball that determine its nature are objective, the only thing subjective is the purpose that you imbue upon it. Perhaps you should read some more recent scientific literature before posting philosophy on a computer software forum.perfumer wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:53 amFrom a philosophical point of view, and strictly speaking, NOTHING is objective. Everything is how it appears to you. So if you see a ball and say 'this is a ball', this is subjective. If you measure a frequency of 1 kHz with your spectroscope, this is not objective either.spunkmuffin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:42 am In any case BONES you definitely are objectively terrible.
You guys should really read up on ancient Greek philosophy, before posting around on music forums. This would save the discussion from derailing into error, sin and the realm of Satan (yes, Christianity is about that too).
And the thing itself is not its attributes. That's why the human being - anthropos - is unfindable.
BTW, Buddhism is about the same thing too.