MUTOOLS

ghettosynth · Post by **ghettosynth** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:18 am

Does mulab read your waves plugins? It isn't reading mine, but, I have some plugin weirdness going on and I'm doing some debugging. I'm just curious if other people have run into this?

mutools · Post by **mutools** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:35 am

http://www.mutools.com/info/docs/mux/us ... ugins.html

ghettosynth · Post by **ghettosynth** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:52 am

So, ok, but, has anyone got that to work with Waves? I get "No valid source specified"

On edit: for anyone else trying this, you have to specify the full path.

syntonica · Post by **syntonica** » Sun Nov 20, 2016 1:47 pm

This was discussed just recently here:

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 9&t=470661

The waves shell is an evil little beasty...

fluffy_little_something · Thu Nov 24, 2016 1:31 pm

We have had a Waves thread some time ago where someone posted an instruction on how to use Waves stuff in any DAW. I will see if I can find it...

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 9&t=386452

Use the free shell2vst thingy...

heks · Post by **heks** » Sun Jan 29, 2017 11:57 am

Just wondering if Waves hosting is any closer to being implemented. None of the shell converters work for me and this morning I was really pi**ed off having to load metapluggin to use some of my waves plugins. Its exacerbated (for me) by being able to just use them straight away when I use studio one (but I find MuLab is so much quicker to create music in).
There that feels sooo much better voicing my annoyances,,,,sorry Jo

grumpy old git getting back to it now

fluffy_little_something · Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:11 pm

Any news in this respect?

mutools · Post by **mutools** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:45 pm

Nothing planned on short term wrt shell VSTs.
If there is news, it will be in the news section.
You can also always check the change log: http://www.mutools.com/mulab-mux-change-log.html

ghettosynth · Post by **ghettosynth** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:56 pm

mutools wrote:Nothing planned on short term wrt shell VSTs.
If there is news, it will be in the news section.
You can also always check the change log: http://www.mutools.com/mulab-mux-change-log.html

What is the technical issue with Shell based plugins?

mutools · Post by **mutools** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:16 pm

The issue is that other FRs have more priority.

heks · Post by **heks** » Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:38 pm

mutools wrote:The issue is that other FRs have more priority.

Just wondering, how many people have to request this to make it a priority? Not being arsy just wondering. if it pushes it up the list hosting waves would make MuLab more in line with the big boys of DAWs

ghettosynth · Post by **ghettosynth** » Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:46 pm

mutools wrote:The issue is that other FRs have more priority.

That doesn't really answer my question.

Grizzellda · Post by **Grizzellda** » Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:40 pm

Indeed, it does not seem to answer your question, and I too have wondered similar things about the technical stuff involved here, with this WaveShell thing.

Logical thinking tells me that because most DAW's handle these plugins with ease must mean that it is not to much of a technical issue...so why not MuLab?

Perhaps it is so simple...MuTools just doesn't give a shit?

I'm sorta joking, but, um...dunno actually...

Jo!!! Talk to us here, will ya? Please.

ADDENDUM: I know you are working on time stretching & GUI scaling and that is the important infa-structure stuff of the application...but come on, can't you just fix this Waves thing already and we will all shut up about it ...well at least I will!!!

imstre · Post by **imstre** » Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:57 pm

[quote="Grizzellda"]Indeed, it does not seem to answer your question, and I too have wondered similar things about the technical stuff involved here, with this WaveShell thing.

Logical thinking tells me that because most DAW's handle these plugins with ease must mean that it is not to much of a technical issue...so why not MuLab?

Why work for me waves?
I do not need waves because good mux Effects

you with mac? for mac logic its ok

Grizzellda · Post by **Grizzellda** » Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:58 pm

imstre wrote: Why work for me waves?
I do not need waves because good mux Effects
you with mac? for mac logic its ok

Alright, I'm not quite sure what you're point is here, but I am fairly confident that the MUX, at least in it's current state of development & support is not going to replace alot of Waves plugs...

But I was actually asking Jo a question, and it would be nice to hear what he says about it!

MUTOOLS

KVR Audio

Waves Plugins