Picking back up after hiatus, DAW recommendations?
-
Chris Roberson Chris Roberson https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=49114
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 520 posts since 24 Nov, 2004 from Texas
Hello everyone,
I haven't really done a great deal of writing music on my PC in quite a while, looking to get back into that side of electronic music more vs. just synth programming and live performance.
When I more regularly created, I was using Computer Muzys 1.5, so very bare-bones but free and I became quite good with it. Now, that software just about won't work at all, between it being so old and 64-bit plus VST3 becoming more prolific.
My question, as much of a stretch as it may be, is: can anyone recommend a DAW with a workflow/interface that is at least in the same ballpark as Muzys? I couldn't really get any traction with Live and though I think FL is close in some areas, some of the key shortcuts as well as mouse operations are completely counter-intuitive after coming from Muzys.
Any thoughts and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
- Chris
I haven't really done a great deal of writing music on my PC in quite a while, looking to get back into that side of electronic music more vs. just synth programming and live performance.
When I more regularly created, I was using Computer Muzys 1.5, so very bare-bones but free and I became quite good with it. Now, that software just about won't work at all, between it being so old and 64-bit plus VST3 becoming more prolific.
My question, as much of a stretch as it may be, is: can anyone recommend a DAW with a workflow/interface that is at least in the same ballpark as Muzys? I couldn't really get any traction with Live and though I think FL is close in some areas, some of the key shortcuts as well as mouse operations are completely counter-intuitive after coming from Muzys.
Any thoughts and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
- Chris
Roberson Audio Synthesizers
-
- KVRist
- 336 posts since 23 Apr, 2011 from Seattle WA
I'm not familiar with Muzys, but I just recently discovered Acoustica Mixcraft and I really like it so far. Great price, VERY stable, VERY intuitive, has some decent included content, and it has a lite (but handy) version of Ableton's session clips.
I'm tired of Ableton's bloat over the last couple versions, and it's become too unstable and unfocused on live performance. That and it's way expensive.
I liked the Tracktion concept, but it was too unstable.
I'm tired of Ableton's bloat over the last couple versions, and it's become too unstable and unfocused on live performance. That and it's way expensive.
I liked the Tracktion concept, but it was too unstable.
Check out my cloud! https://soundcloud.com/schmidi_0
- KVRian
- 1441 posts since 4 Oct, 2012 from Utah
Hello!
Mulab could be considered the spiritual successor to Muzys. I'd definitely give that a look if you're looking for a similar workflow.
Technology wise, I'd say Bitwig, FLS, Studio One, or Ableton would be the places to look for features/modern workflows. Bitwig is my happy middle ground as it combines a lot of the workflow of a traditional DAW with the freedoms of a modular architecture. FLS and Ableton are the "standard" right now. They both have a lot of support and are tried and tested. Studio One is more in line with a "professionals" workflow. It's got tools for almost everything, but it can feel a bit overwhelming/large for a purely synthetic project.
Mulab could be considered the spiritual successor to Muzys. I'd definitely give that a look if you're looking for a similar workflow.
Technology wise, I'd say Bitwig, FLS, Studio One, or Ableton would be the places to look for features/modern workflows. Bitwig is my happy middle ground as it combines a lot of the workflow of a traditional DAW with the freedoms of a modular architecture. FLS and Ableton are the "standard" right now. They both have a lot of support and are tried and tested. Studio One is more in line with a "professionals" workflow. It's got tools for almost everything, but it can feel a bit overwhelming/large for a purely synthetic project.
My Setup.
Now goes by Eurydice(Izzy) - she/her
Now goes by Eurydice(Izzy) - she/her
-
- KVRist
- 63 posts since 16 May, 2009
To be honest maybe you should give bitwig a go. I know this is something similar to live but with what is included in version 3 this is a great environonment for electronic experimenting and music creation.
Regards
Wojtek
https://stereosound.pl
Regards
Wojtek
https://stereosound.pl
-
- KVRAF
- 1858 posts since 26 Nov, 2018
Have you tried reaper yet?
(oh, you cheeky bastard! )
(oh, you cheeky bastard! )
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
Bitwig
- KVRian
- 643 posts since 17 Aug, 2015 from Finland
I second REAPER. It's at least one of the more user-friendly DAWs, with its customizability and selection of custom themes and whatnot.
My solo projects:
Hekkräiser (experimental) | MFG38 (electronic/soundtrack) | The Santtu Pesonen Project (metal/prog)
Hekkräiser (experimental) | MFG38 (electronic/soundtrack) | The Santtu Pesonen Project (metal/prog)
- KVRAF
- 8828 posts since 6 Jan, 2017 from Outer Space
-
- KVRAF
- 1742 posts since 9 Jul, 2014 from UK
List every known DAW here. Go.
I wonder what happens if I press this button...
-
heavymetalmixer heavymetalmixer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=391539
- KVRian
- 692 posts since 8 Jan, 2017
Reaper. Maybe it's not the most user-friendly if you're focusing on making beats or arrangements, but its workflow is actually very simple, easy to understand and to get used to, unlike most DAWs out there.
-
- KVRAF
- 1858 posts since 26 Nov, 2018
But you didn't list one, point shaved!
- Banned
- 11467 posts since 4 Jan, 2017 from Warsaw, Poland
I've no idea about Muzys, but Bitwig or Studio One should be the ones to check - the former if you want more free-form, modular and performance-based experience, the latter for a more traditional workflow. Think of the as nwere, less bloated and more modern versions of Live and Cubase respectively.
-
- KVRist
- 171 posts since 8 Jun, 2019
Except how it handles takes, which is completely insane. I've only used Reaper for recording live bands, so it may not come up as much for ITB electronic music. Reaper takes are f**king dogshit though, and it's easy to accidentally use them.heavymetalmixer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:25 pm Reaper. Maybe it's not the most user-friendly if you're focusing on making beats or arrangements, but its workflow is actually very simple, easy to understand and to get used to, unlike most DAWs out there.
https://forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=210747
http://admiralbumblebee.com/music/2018/ ... nd-Me.html