Monthly subscription fee $10.000?
Whose gonna step it up for DAW's 2020
- KVRAF
- 10586 posts since 31 Aug, 2013 from Somewhere near the Morgul Vale.
Logic didn't do 10.5 this year as expected, only maintenance updates and the ability for thousands of tracks. Either 10.5 or 11 will drop this year, and I said months ago, I think the next upgrade will not be free.
“Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
-Martin Luther King Jr.
-Martin Luther King Jr.
- Banned
- 2288 posts since 24 Mar, 2015 from Toronto, Canada
did you switch to Cubase or you gave up?
Spotify Soundcloud Soundclick
Gear & Setup: Windows 10, Dual Xeon, 32GB RAM, Cubase 10.5/9.5, NI Komplete Audio 6, NI Maschine, NI Jam, NI Kontakt
Gear & Setup: Windows 10, Dual Xeon, 32GB RAM, Cubase 10.5/9.5, NI Komplete Audio 6, NI Maschine, NI Jam, NI Kontakt
- KVRAF
- 10586 posts since 31 Aug, 2013 from Somewhere near the Morgul Vale.
Cubase was always a backup plan for if/when I switch from Mac to PC. Cubase is far less efficient on a Mac than Logic. I learned the basics, so if the switch does happen, I won't be completely ignorant.
“Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
-Martin Luther King Jr.
-Martin Luther King Jr.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105800 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
- KVRAF
- 10239 posts since 7 Sep, 2006 from Roseville, CA
Make Audacity Great Again 2020
Logic Pro | PolyBrute | MatrixBrute | MiniFreak | Prophet 6 | Trigon 6 | OB-6 | Rev2 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Polar TI2 | Blofeld | RYTMmk2 | Digitone | Syntakt | Digitakt | Integra-7
-
- KVRAF
- 4494 posts since 3 Oct, 2013 from Budapest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79Y6Q47qjlw
it's quite innovative one
it's quite innovative one
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
- KVRAF
- 3828 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from Underworld
When it comes to DAWs, I think they've got all too many features already. We've got to step it up and make some good music.
All they need to step up is stability IMHO. All DAW makers could work on the stability issues for the next 10 years and still have issues.
Oh, and I'm working in Reaper, which is fairly stable, but it can always be more stable.
All they need to step up is stability IMHO. All DAW makers could work on the stability issues for the next 10 years and still have issues.
Oh, and I'm working in Reaper, which is fairly stable, but it can always be more stable.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Jiddu Krishnamurti
-
- Banned
- 2525 posts since 4 Jul, 2019
Agree re features, DAWs are ridiculously powerful now - it is more workflow (ie UX design) that needs development (speaking Reaper here as that is what I know best)DuX wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:43 pm When it comes to DAWs, I think they've got all too many features already. We've got to step it up and make some good music.
All they need to step up is stability IMHO. All DAW makers could work on the stability issues for the next 10 years and still have issues.
Oh, and I'm working in Reaper, which is fairly stable, but it can always be more stable.
I'd like to see Reaper improve usability with some interface improvements - simple ones like consistency mainly but also refinement of presentation to fit in with the main understandings HCI research and practise has shown over the last few years. Agree re Reaper stability - mostly okay but occasional hanging. Had a crash yesterday that required a hard boot for example
Reaper is not really subject to user input other than feature expansions though. I think the dev has said he has no interest in usability etc and Reaper is more or less the commercialisation of his personal DAW
Last edited by fairlyclose on Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 4799 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
I think a DAW can have too many features, at the expense of workflow and stability.
MuLab nicely prioritizes those two.
MuLab nicely prioritizes those two.
s a v e
y o u r
f l o w
y o u r
f l o w
-
- KVRAF
- 1996 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
I too would like to see more of a "keep it simple stupid" approach. I won't mention what I use to avoid debate, but I use it because to me it's the least intrusive visually and feature-wise.
An open-platform DAW that allowed third-party audio editors (like ARA), MIDI editors, mixers, browsers, recorders, etc. would be interesting. Roll your own.
An open-platform DAW that allowed third-party audio editors (like ARA), MIDI editors, mixers, browsers, recorders, etc. would be interesting. Roll your own.
- Banned
- 11467 posts since 4 Jan, 2017 from Warsaw, Poland
Perhaps not 2020, but who knows...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 25399 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
+1Echoes in the Attic wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:11 am I think Bitwig have been pretty innovative so far and I'm looking forward to what they'll bring in 2020.
They have a lot of fresh concepts and implementations so it’s fun to watch what they come up with next.
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
I dont know what kind of features you expect, but if you expect such that makes a track for you, there is a living and breathing DAW called = hire a producer. Its expensive but he can make music to you
As someone said we have too many features, and it is true you just may not realise it. Every daw packs basicly same stuff, just some are better in some area and some not.
As someone said we have too many features, and it is true you just may not realise it. Every daw packs basicly same stuff, just some are better in some area and some not.
- KVRian
- 935 posts since 21 Aug, 2017 from Brasil