48 kHZ or 44.1 kHZ ?

How to do this, that and the other. Share, learn, teach. How did X do that? How can I sound like Y?
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

You can't beat 8 bit for that crunchy sound :tu: :help:
I wonder what happens if I press this button...

Post

fmr wrote: Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:52 am And working at 48 kHz will only be MARGINALLY BETTER.
Please read previous posts regards DAC/ADAC capabilities, filtering, and the ideal 60khz samplerate...


Personally I have found recording & processing at 48khz more-than marginally better, while 96khz was only marginally better than 48khz. YMMV

ramseysounds wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:08 am You can't beat 8 bit for that crunchy sound :tu: :help:
You can't even tell the difference with most modern, overcompressed music!
https://www.audiocheck.net/blindtests_16vs8bit.php

Post

metamorphosis wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:29 am You can't even tell the difference with most modern, overcompressed music!
https://www.audiocheck.net/blindtests_16vs8bit.php
I can get over 95% confidence with that test. 8-bit version is not as clean. I can't get it 100% correct though.
Peace, my friends. I'm not seeking arguments here. ;)

Post

metamorphosis wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:29 am
ramseysounds wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:08 am You can't beat 8 bit for that crunchy sound :tu: :help:
You can't even tell the difference with most modern, overcompressed music!
https://www.audiocheck.net/blindtests_16vs8bit.php
Have you heard of humour? :wink:
I wonder what happens if I press this button...

Post

^^^^ :tu:

Post

ramseysounds wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:15 am
metamorphosis wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:29 am
ramseysounds wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:08 am You can't beat 8 bit for that crunchy sound :tu: :help:
You can't even tell the difference with most modern, overcompressed music!
https://www.audiocheck.net/blindtests_16vs8bit.php
Have you heard of humour? :wink:
Have you??

Post

poonna wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:59 am
metamorphosis wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:29 am You can't even tell the difference with most modern, overcompressed music!
https://www.audiocheck.net/blindtests_16vs8bit.php
I can get over 95% confidence with that test. 8-bit version is not as clean. I can't get it 100% correct though.
I get about 98% - main difference is slight subjective volume drop for me

Post

16/44, you can always come back and remix to 48

Post

I definitely hear the benefit of 48

Post

sure why not
Image

Post

metamorphosis wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:29 am ... regarding DAC/ADAC capabilities, filtering, and the ideal 60khz samplerate ...
Personally I have found recording & processing at 57.362 khz best. After many
sessions and comparisons I came to the conclusion that 57.362 khz sounds
harmonically better and warmer than any other sample-rate. 8)
free mp3s + info: andy-enroe.de songs + weird stuff: enroe.de

Post

48khz is audible better with 8bit depth - i guess it is the same with 24 bit just not so audible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgOayE-9zD0

Post

enroe wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 3:27 pm
metamorphosis wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:29 am ... regarding DAC/ADAC capabilities, filtering, and the ideal 60khz samplerate ...
Personally I have found recording & processing at 57.362 khz best. After many
sessions and comparisons I came to the conclusion that 57.362 khz sounds
harmonically better and warmer than any other sample-rate. 8)
pffft! Try 59.12 for the real sweetness...

Post

VELLTONE MUSIC wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:17 pm 48khz is audible better with 8bit depth - i guess it is the same with 24 bit just not so audible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgOayE-9zD0
that makes absolutely no sense..
Image

Post

Yep,If you are deaf...

Post Reply

Return to “Production Techniques”