Trial version crashes my DAWs (Reaper and Renoise) when I load my loops in the stem slots..
First time it went OK, but now it's not liking my beats.
Also loading of the trial takes quite some time ( core i5 6600k, 32GB RAM, fast SSD ).
How is the full version behaving?
"Rhythmiq" by Accusonus, $99 intro price
-
- KVRian
- 1434 posts since 21 Nov, 2005 from The Netherlands
-
- KVRAF
- 4506 posts since 25 Mar, 2016 from Seattle
Can you sample straight into this or can you only import audio? It would really slow my drum machine work flow down if you had to record the drums first and then import
-
- KVRian
- 1434 posts since 21 Nov, 2005 from The Netherlands
I don't see a record option.
-
- KVRist
- 233 posts since 1 Sep, 2003 from Studio Telex
Am I missing something or is there no multi outs? Kind of essential....
-
- Banned
- 1792 posts since 8 Sep, 2019 from Calenberg
I had a minor issue with one expansion pack on my iMac and sent out a support mail yesterday. Today I received a comprehensive answer with a solution for my problem.
Top support!
Top support!
-
- KVRian
- 1434 posts since 21 Nov, 2005 from The Netherlands
They are working on fixing the crashes, had some mail exchange with their support about it.
-
- KVRist
- 107 posts since 4 Mar, 2015
Tried the demo, works perfect in Ableton. I'm getting pretty good results when I load 3 individual loops. When you ask Rhythmiq to split one loop into 3, the results I'm getting are poor. Overall I like it, much better than just using Ableton beat repeat or Audiodamage Replikant. Might just get this!
-
- KVRer
- 23 posts since 30 Jul, 2013
It's so resizable you can resize it down to 0 pixels! Although it will then crash on you.
-
- KVRAF
- 4321 posts since 26 Jun, 2004
Is there any plan for live audio inputs and multi outs for this thing?
Im sure that is a lot of work, and it would create some major cpu overhead compared to what its doing now, but imo those features are extremely important for a tool like this. Basically its the difference between 'no thanks' and 'absolutely' for me.
Im sure that is a lot of work, and it would create some major cpu overhead compared to what its doing now, but imo those features are extremely important for a tool like this. Basically its the difference between 'no thanks' and 'absolutely' for me.
-
- KVRist
- 233 posts since 1 Sep, 2003 from Studio Telex
Certainly the lack of multi outs is holding me off buying. I hope they do sort it and before the intro price ends!highkoo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2019 6:00 pm Is there any plan for live audio inputs and multi outs for this thing?
Im sure that is a lot of work, and it would create some major cpu overhead compared to what its doing now, but imo those features are extremely important for a tool like this. Basically its the difference between 'no thanks' and 'absolutely' for me.
-
- KVRAF
- 4321 posts since 26 Jun, 2004
The input is the key bit for me, workflow wise.
Its the same with Twisted Tools Ultraloop.
If we could route live audio into it, it would amazing on a whole other level. Id be willing to pay the cpu/latency price for something like that. Afaik, none of the good beat manglers take live input.
Otherwise, its bouncing bus groupsjust to load them into tools like this. pita!
Its the same with Twisted Tools Ultraloop.
If we could route live audio into it, it would amazing on a whole other level. Id be willing to pay the cpu/latency price for something like that. Afaik, none of the good beat manglers take live input.
Otherwise, its bouncing bus groupsjust to load them into tools like this. pita!
-
- KVRAF
- 2772 posts since 22 May, 2017
The more the merrier. Rhythmiq looks like a lot of fun.enCiphered wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 3:47 pm All this is already possible with Ultraloop from Twisted Tools and much much more.
