From all that I've seen of this guy and his various schemes, i distrust everything about him. No doubt he's trying to market at the pro-studios and Elton Johns of this world that have cash to burn, but quotes like those above are just loaded with the same bullshit techniques used by scam artists from all walks of life.
Now that was an expensive EQ plugin!
- KVRAF
- 1959 posts since 21 Sep, 2007 from The Infinite Void
-
- KVRAF
- 6465 posts since 17 Dec, 2009
- KVRAF
- 4433 posts since 15 Nov, 2006 from Hell
so when it comes to DSP, he's basically about as competent as John Vestman?
I don't know what to write here that won't be censored, as I can only speak in profanity.
-
mike_the_ranger mike_the_ranger https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=393922
- KVRist
- 262 posts since 16 Feb, 2017
Because it would violate the laws of physics, it's impossible. Either pre-ringing or echoing has to be there. That's why he corrected it in the statement, saying it was a marketing mistakePloki wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 11:12 amI haven't yet found an EQ that wouldn't ring, especially linear phase, and am really curious how it fares on that.Absence of discernible pre or post–echos; does not disperse signal over time. Transients remain clear and sharp, perceptually true to the original recording.
-
- KVRAF
- 2087 posts since 24 Jun, 2006 from London, England
If you want to stop an EQ from ringing you have to make sure it's set to Airplane mode.
-
- Banned
- 658 posts since 4 Oct, 2018
-
- KVRist
- 337 posts since 7 Sep, 2012
-
- KVRAF
- 6465 posts since 17 Dec, 2009
lol, calling a blatant lie a marketing mistake. good way to start a business.mike_the_ranger wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:15 pm
Because it would violate the laws of physics, it's impossible. Either pre-ringing or echoing has to be there. That's why he corrected it in the statement, saying it was a marketing mistake
-
- KVRist
- 283 posts since 22 Sep, 2015
I'm not firm with some terms: what does "filtering in time domain" mean? Is it just another word for convolution? What would "filtering in the spectral domain" be? Because I readconvolution is more efficient in the spectral domain... Is this all just marketing bla?
Anyways sneaky marketing, s**t copy protection, price way beyond any rationality and sound is not convincing. It bothers me there still will be customers buying this thing and support such a company.
Anyways sneaky marketing, s**t copy protection, price way beyond any rationality and sound is not convincing. It bothers me there still will be customers buying this thing and support such a company.
- Banned
- 7624 posts since 13 Nov, 2015 from Norway