Uhbik 2.0 public alpha 02, rev. 9629 (Catalina ready)
-
- KVRAF
- 4213 posts since 15 Sep, 2010
Can't wait for the official release
-
- KVRer
- 5 posts since 12 Feb, 2011
I love the v2 update.
I have a suggestion.
Compressor's ratio is a little odd. The Ratio control should most of the resolution in the 1:1 - 4:1. once you get to 8:1 or 10:1 the fine tuning is negligible.
I have a suggestion.
Compressor's ratio is a little odd. The Ratio control should most of the resolution in the 1:1 - 4:1. once you get to 8:1 or 10:1 the fine tuning is negligible.
- KVRAF
- 3045 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
I rather like the linear approach
-
- KVRAF
- 6821 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
It is a very nice update for sure. I love the new interface, the modulations, and the new features added. Thanks @ U-He team !
-
tasmaniandevil tasmaniandevil https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=62450
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1713 posts since 22 Mar, 2005 from a planet called u-he
Just click the blue download button on Uhbik's website: https://u-he.com/products/uhbik/
It will download the Catalina ready version of the current release version. You can identify it by it's revision number, which is 3899 (instead of 3898 for the non Catalina ready version).
-
- Banned
- 1646 posts since 4 Aug, 2017
The alpha is working great over here. When are you moving to the beta?
-
- Banned
- 1646 posts since 4 Aug, 2017
- KVRAF
- 4250 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Vancouver
Is anyone else finding these run a little hot? Uhbik-D seems to amplify. I have Podolski playing a single note to Uhbik-D as a send. From what I can tell, the first echo should be the same volume as the initial sound, but it's actually louder.
the old free version may not work boots successfully on new generations of computers, instruments, and hardware
- KVRAF
- 4250 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Vancouver
To make things simpler, I just added Uhbik-D as an insert effect, loaded the "dubai" preset and changed the mix to 50%. It's obvious from the Uhbik display that the first echo is louder than the input sound.
Are the "Input Gain" and "Wet Gain" supposed to be centered for unity? The Input Gain says "50.00" when I center it and the Wet Gain says "50%" when centered.
Are the "Input Gain" and "Wet Gain" supposed to be centered for unity? The Input Gain says "50.00" when I center it and the Wet Gain says "50%" when centered.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
the old free version may not work boots successfully on new generations of computers, instruments, and hardware
-
tasmaniandevil tasmaniandevil https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=62450
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1713 posts since 22 Mar, 2005 from a planet called u-he
Yes, because the volume of the delay tap is set to 100, which makes the first delay twice as loud as the input signal. Set it to 50 to achieve equal loudness between input signal and first echo.
- u-he
- 28043 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hmm, it does look odd though, doesn't it? I suspect Uhbik-D sums the stereo input and puts that on its "virtual tape", thus making the wet signal twice as loud per tap. I suspect this was a design choice ten years ago, but I can't remember.
- KVRAF
- 4250 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Vancouver
There's nothing wrong with a volume that cuts and boosts. It would be nice for it to be a bit more obvious, like having a notch at the center point or numbers that go minus to the left and plus to the right. Having them default to effective 200% volume but labeling it 100 is confusing (to me.)
the old free version may not work boots successfully on new generations of computers, instruments, and hardware