u-he

RobGee · Post by **RobGee** » Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:44 pm

Urs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 11:19 am
DarkStar wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:20 am The first rule of Uhbik Rack (Uhbik-X) is:
Urs wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:40 pm The possibility is real, but we will not show/discuss anything tangible before we go beta with this
No discussion needed, but I hope that you consider serial / parallel FX paths (a la Blue Cat Audio) and others) at some stage.
Screen Shot 2019-11-13 at 12.18.42.png

That looks much more interesting, especially when combined with the new modulators.

aaron aardvark · Post by **aaron aardvark** » Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:30 am

Curious to see how it will look............OK never mind. I see the other thread now.

MorpherX · Post by **MorpherX** » Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:27 am

Requests:

1. Could you please test that many instances of Uhbiks not lead to sluggish GUI response or crashes inside a DAW.
(That's the reason why didn't use it many years)

2. Would it be possible to implement a smart FX-Bypass, so that Uhbiks don't use CPU-Cycles if there is no signal audio input.
3. I also bought Filterscape years ago. Could it also get such nice update.

Beside this, congrat to this wonderfull update !

Ploki · Post by **Ploki** » Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:54 am

MorpherX wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:27 am
2. Would it be possible to implement a smart FX-Bypass, so that Uhbiks don't use CPU-Cycles if there is no signal audio input.

Depends on which DAW you use, that might already work. I know it doesnt on logic

david.beholder · Post by **david.beholder** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:26 am

Ploki wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:54 am Depends on which DAW you use, that might already work. I know it doesnt on logic

Welcome to Apple

Rivanni · Post by **Rivanni** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 8:50 am

MorpherX wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:27 am Requests:

1. Could you please test that many instances of Uhbiks not lead to sluggish GUI response or crashes inside a DAW.
(That's the reason why didn't use it many years)

Why don't you test it yourself? See if you still have those issues. If so, report them here or to u-he support.

PieBerger · Post by **PieBerger** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:05 am

Rivanni wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 8:50 am
MorpherX wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:27 am Requests:

1. Could you please test that many instances of Uhbiks not lead to sluggish GUI response or crashes inside a DAW.
(That's the reason why didn't use it many years)
Why don't you test it yourself? See if you still have those issues. If so, report them here or to u-he support.

u-he should have some sort of public testing phase where people can check performance on their systems and feedback before they go live with a production release

sascha · Post by **sascha** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:13 am

That's exactly why we do public betas, and now even a public alpha.

Ploki · Post by **Ploki** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:20 am

i think he was being sarcastic

PieBerger · Post by **PieBerger** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:27 am

Sorry I thought the upside smiley would be a giveaway

Ploki · Post by **Ploki** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:39 am

Maybe sascha was being sarcastic as well

sascha · Post by **sascha** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:50 am

I'm not that much into sarcasm, just wanted to emphasize our attempt with these things. But I'm not into upside-down smileys either. Maybe should have my daughter give me a lecture on emojis and memes...

Infinite5ths · Post by **Infinite5ths** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:14 pm

They are exactly like regular smileys, only upside-down. Think of them as reverse-polarity smileys. So if you use a regular smiley and an upside-down smiley side-by-side, they cancel out; and you've wasted all of your typing. However, if you combine a half-upside-down smiley (i.e. a 90deg polarity smiley) with a regular smiley, you can actually get smiley-peak-enhancement, which makes everybody feel extra good.

sascha wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:50 am I'm not that much into sarcasm, just wanted to emphasize our attempt with these things. But I'm not into upside-down smileys either. Maybe should have my daughter give me a lecture on emojis and memes...

david.beholder · Post by **david.beholder** » Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:30 pm

It might be interesting to have feedback path in delay and reverb affected by other uhbiks.

flocked · Post by **flocked** » Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:22 am

I would greatly suggest to change the plugin names. It's super confusing for me and always requires me to think a few seconds which plugin I want to use.
Also back then when I didn't exactly know what Uhbik is, the names confused me from a marketing point of view

And yes, I read about the problem with the plugin IDs, but I think the incompability to version Uhbik 1 is worth the name change.
-
also +1 for the possible rack. Something with the concept of Unfiltered Audio BYOME, but with the uhbik plugins would be great

u-he

KVR Audio

Uhbik 2.0 - Concepts & Roadmap