Yes. So for example, tagged presets can be shared and the tags will be seen by whoever you share them with.Touch The Universe wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:31 pm Awesome, thanks guys. Is the tagging saved in the preset file itself?
Hive 2.0
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 11520 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
-
- KVRAF
- 23103 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Yes, of course. There's no point in doing it any other way.Touch The Universe wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:31 pm Awesome, thanks guys. Is the tagging saved in the preset file itself?
-
Touch The Universe Touch The Universe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=190615 - KVRAF
- 4772 posts since 2 Oct, 2008
It's awesome the way it saves the tags in the presets in the background, without me having to do it manually. Nice.
High Quality Soundsets for Lush-101 | Hive | Electra 2 | Diversion | Halion | Largo | Rapid | Dune II | Thorn | and more.
TTU Youtube
TTU Youtube
-
- KVRAF
- 4123 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
In Hive, click on the u-he badge and select "user guide".
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28065 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
To clarify: We also have a database running in the background which holds a list of all presets and their tags. This allows for *fast* queries. Usually this database is updated when a plug-in is instantiated for the first time, but this can be disabled. Then, one has to refresh the database manually when installing third party presets.
-
- KVRist
- 353 posts since 24 Dec, 2015
There is something that I was wondering about the distortion FX : would it be feasible to add a "polyphonic mode" option for it ?
I understand that it goes against the low CPU usage philosophy of Hive 2 yet it would add a lot timbre-wise. What do you think ?
I understand that it goes against the low CPU usage philosophy of Hive 2 yet it would add a lot timbre-wise. What do you think ?
-
- KVRAF
- 4123 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
Although it works nicely in Repro-5, I don't think per-voice distortion would be the best use of CPU in Hive. In combination with the engine selection, the filters already offer quite a wide variety of per-voice distortion - more than you might think.
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28065 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28065 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRAF
- 23103 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
...and a mix&match user mode of course 
I think with that, oscillators and/or subs bypassing the FX (or even better - tapping in only after a certain FX!), "like osc" subs ignoring unison of master... that's already a very nice feature update
I think with that, oscillators and/or subs bypassing the FX (or even better - tapping in only after a certain FX!), "like osc" subs ignoring unison of master... that's already a very nice feature update
-
- KVRist
- 353 posts since 24 Dec, 2015
Thanks for the explanations! Indeed, that makes sense in the context of Hive. Actually per-voice distortion (with random panning) is a thing that I do a lot when making patches for Repro-5. As well as the insert FX waveshapers in Massive and MX.
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 11520 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
Sounds like the feature set for Hive 2.5 has been locked down.EvilDragon wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:24 pm ...and a mix&match user mode of course
I think with that, oscillators and/or subs bypassing the FX (or even better - tapping in only after a certain FX!), "like osc" subs ignoring unison of master... that's already a very nice feature update
-
- KVRian
- 775 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from sweden
tasty idea. i like the ”engine” scheme Hive employs and i agree w HS that per-voice drive options via various gain stages is probably overlooked; furthermore that p-v waveshaping from the fx block would more than likely take a bat to Hive’s knee-caps
-
- KVRist
- 52 posts since 14 May, 2004 from ---
Hive 2 is fantastic. I love it as well as zebra. There is only ONE thing I want to have absolutely: That is a Midifile export button for the Sequencers / Arpeggiators.
So often I have good sequences, but if I want to edit them in the DAW / Host Sequencer there is no solution. I always have to set the notes in the DAW sequencer manually, thats so...annoying.
So, Could you implement a Midifile Export button on the synths like Zebra and Hive please ?
So often I have good sequences, but if I want to edit them in the DAW / Host Sequencer there is no solution. I always have to set the notes in the DAW sequencer manually, thats so...annoying.
So, Could you implement a Midifile Export button on the synths like Zebra and Hive please ?
---
