Mr. Stian,
I refer to Acoustica Premium 7.1.1, running on Windows 10 Professional 64-bit.
About the vertical zoom in Acoustica: In each channel, this zooming seems to work always around a fixed horizontal line, keeping that horizontal line fixed in the window. When we are in the waveform window, that fixed line is naturally the central horizontal line in the channel window, that is, the minus infinity line.
But when we are in the spectrogram window, for each channel, the vertical zoom seems still to work around the central horizontal line of the channel, which is some line at approximately 3200 Hz in the Mel scale, or at approximately 11000 Hz in a linear scale.
In the spectrogram, keeping the central line fixed seems to be quite an unnatural behaviour to me. Why would someone be generally interested in zooming around 3200 Hz (in the default Mel scale)? In my case, whenever I use the vertical zoom I am generally interested in what happens with the audio at the lowest frequencies, to see something about hum, or the bass line, or less frequently about fundamental frequencies in the piano keyboard range (< about 4000 Hz). After zooming, a scroll is always necessary to see the lower part of the spectrogram.
So, my question: is there any definite reason why the vertical zoom on the spectrogram window is performed around the central horizontal line of the channel? Has that central line been defined as the fixed line in a deliberate way? Or is this behaviour just an automatic legacy of the vertical zooming in the waveform window?
In other words, what should be the most proper fixed line for the vertical zoom in the spectrogram? Shouldn't maybe the vertical zoom, more properly, be configured so as to keep the bottommost 0 Hz fixed? In that way, the vertical zoom would always present to the user the lower part of the spectrogram, at different degrees of magnification. Then, an upward scroll would only be necessary if the user is interested in the upper portions of the spectrogram.
Regards,
Paulo
Acoustica Premium 7.1.1 - vertical zoom in the sprectrogram
Official support for: acondigital.com
Moderator: stian
Acoustica Premium 7.1.1 - vertical zoom in the sprectrogram
2018-11-15T00:37:57+00:00
Mr. Stian,
I refer to Acoustica Premium 7.1.1, running on Windows 10 Professional 64-bit.
About the vertical zoom in Acoustica: In each channel, this zooming seems to work always around a fixed horizontal line, keeping that horizontal line fixed in the window. When we are in the waveform window, that fixed line is naturally the central horizontal line in the channel window, that is, the minus infinity line.
But when we are in the spectrogram window, for each channel, the vertical zoom seems still to work around the central horizontal line of the channel, which is some line at approximately 3200 Hz in the Mel scale, or at approximately 11000 Hz in a linear scale.
In the spectrogram, keeping the central line fixed seems to be quite an unnatural behaviour to me. Why would someone be generally interested in zooming around 3200 Hz (in the default Mel scale)? In my case, whenever I use the vertical zoom I am generally interested in what happens with the audio at the lowest frequencies, to see something about hum, or the bass line, or less frequently about fundamental frequencies in the piano keyboard range (< about 4000 Hz). After zooming, a scroll is always necessary to see the lower part of the spectrogram.
So, my question: is there any definite reason why the vertical zoom on the spectrogram window is performed around the central horizontal line of the channel? Has that central line been defined as the fixed line in a deliberate way? Or is this behaviour just an automatic legacy of the vertical zooming in the waveform window?
In other words, what should be the most proper fixed line for the vertical zoom in the spectrogram? Shouldn't maybe the vertical zoom, more properly, be configured so as to keep the bottommost 0 Hz fixed? In that way, the vertical zoom would always present to the user the lower part of the spectrogram, at different degrees of magnification. Then, an upward scroll would only be necessary if the user is interested in the upper portions of the spectrogram.
Regards,
Paulo
Paulo-Brazil
https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=405528
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 125 posts since 1 Oct, 2017
Post by Paulo-Brazil » Thu Nov 15, 2018 12:37 am
- KVRian
- 1466 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
- Contact:
Yes, the zoom point is, as you assume, inherited from the wave form view. I agree that the lower frequency range is probably of most interest and I've added an entry in our tracking system for this.
Best,
Stian
Best,
Stian
Post Reply
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Jump to
- The Main Forums
- ↳ KVR Studio Manager
- ↳ KVR Experts
- ↳ Getting Started (AKA What is the best...?)
- ↳ Instruments
- ↳ Effects
- ↳ Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)
- ↳ Guitars
- ↳ Mobile Apps and Hardware
- ↳ Soundware
- ↳ Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries
- ↳ Hardware (Instruments and Effects)
- ↳ Modular Synthesis
- ↳ Sound Design
- ↳ Production Techniques
- ↳ Music Theory
- ↳ Computer Setup and System Configuration
- ↳ DSP and Plugin Development
- ↳ DIY: Build it and they will come
- ↳ Music Cafe
- ↳ Sell & Buy (+Special Offers, Deals & Promos)
- ↳ KVR Developer Challenge 2023
- ↳ Everything Else (Music related)
- ↳ Off Topic
- ↳ Off Topic Classics
- Official Company Forums
- ↳ 2getheraudio
- ↳ accSone
- ↳ Acon Digital
- ↳ AcousticsampleS
- ↳ AcousModules
- ↳ Agitated State
- ↳ AIR Music Technology
- ↳ AMG
- ↳ Ample Sound
- ↳ Antares Audio Technologies
- ↳ Apisonic Labs
- ↳ apulSoft
- ↳ AriesCode
- ↳ Arts Acoustic
- ↳ Arturia
- ↳ Audjoo
- ↳ AudioSpillage
- ↳ Audiority
- ↳ Best Service
- ↳ Big Tick
- ↳ Bitwig
- ↳ Controller Scripting
- ↳ Blue Cat Audio
- ↳ Cherry Audio
- ↳ CWITEC
- ↳ Embertone
- ↳ energyXT
- ↳ Eventide
- ↳ Expert Sleepers
- ↳ forward audio
- ↳ Future Audio Workshop
- ↳ FXpansion
- ↳ g200kg
- ↳ Harrison Mixbus
- ↳ HG Fortune
- ↳ Homegrown Sounds
- ↳ HoRNet Plugins
- ↳ Ilya Efimov Production
- ↳ Image Line
- ↳ Impact Soundworks
- ↳ Indiginus
- ↳ Insert Piz Here
- ↳ Ju-X
- ↳ Kirk Hunter Studios
- ↳ Kirnu
- ↳ Kong Audio
- ↳ Krotos
- ↳ Kuassa
- ↳ KV331 Audio
- ↳ LennarDigital
- ↳ Les Productions Zvon
- ↳ Liqube Audio
- ↳ Loomer
- ↳ LVC-Audio
- ↳ Maizesoft
- ↳ Manytone Music
- ↳ MeldaProduction
- ↳ Mellowmuse
- ↳ MIDIMood
- ↳ moForte
- ↳ Mozaic Beats
- ↳ mucoder
- ↳ MusicDevelopments
- ↳ Tips & Tricks
- ↳ MusicLab
- ↳ MUTOOLS
- ↳ New Sonic Arts
- ↳ NUSofting
- ↳ Oli Larkin Plugins
- ↳ Orange Tree Samples
- ↳ patchpool
- ↳ Photosounder
- ↳ PlugInGuru
- ↳ Polyverse Music
- ↳ Precisionsound
- ↳ Premier Sound Factory
- ↳ Psychic Modulation
- ↳ Realitone
- ↳ Resonance-Sound
- ↳ Reveal Sound
- ↳ Roger Linn Design
- ↳ rs-met
- ↳ S3A: Spatial Audio
- ↳ SaschArt
- ↳ Smart Electronix
- ↳ sonible
- ↳ SonicBirth
- ↳ Sonic Reality / eSoundz.com
- ↳ Soundiron
- ↳ SPC Plugins
- ↳ Sugar Bytes
- ↳ TAL Software
- ↳ Tokyo Dawn Labs
- ↳ Tracktion
- ↳ u-he
- ↳ u-he Linux support
- ↳ United Plugins
- ↳ VAZ Synths
- ↳ Virharmonic
- ↳ Wolfgang Palm
- ↳ xoxos
- ↳ XSRDO - SynthCraft
- ↳ ZynAddSubFX
- Site Stuff
- ↳ Site Stuff
- Archived Forums
- ↳ AlgoMusic
- ↳ easytoolz
- ↳ Elevayta
- ↳ Hollow Sun
- ↳ Kazrog
- ↳ LinPlug
- ↳ Muse Research and Development
- ↳ Shuriken
- ↳ SoHa Sound Design
- ↳ Soniccouture
- ↳ Topten Software
- ↳ Tweakbench
- ↳ Valhalla DSP
- ↳ CK Modules & VST
- ↳ Sennheiser AMBEO
- ↳ Muon Software
- ↳ Westgatesounds.net
- ↳ Squaredheads
- ↳ Sonigen
- ↳ CFA-Sound
- ↳ Back In Time Records
- ↳ Livelab.dk
- ↳ Skytopia
- ↳ audioD3CK
- ↳ Inspire Audio
- ↳ Krakli
- ↳ Drumdrops
- ↳ Futucraft
- ↳ OverTone DSP
- ↳ RaXnTraX
- ↳ solar3d-software
- ↳ Signaldust
- ↳ Soundemote
- KVR Forum index
- All times are UTC
- Delete cookies