KVR Audio

C00kie · Post by **C00kie** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:40 am

It would be OK-ish when it rendered all things in proportion even when the DPI settings have changed

HunterKiller · Post by **HunterKiller** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:49 am

How ironic is that sig of yours Cookie. Indeed KVR has been assimilated and commercialised.

xtp · Post by **xtp** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:59 am

I guess it might be all right for the youngsters, but this narrow width plays hell on my eyes, I almost get motion sickness everytime i scroll the page

classic · Post by **classic** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:26 am

Now we have a little more to do with the mouse.
When you read the news about new VST's you have to move your mouse two times to become a look at it.
To much extra windows.
There is a word for things like that.

Called: DEV-T = Developed traffic. ( You have to do something which would have been not needed to be done, if someone else would have done it better in the first place) In short words, more work to do that someone else should have done before.

What do you think?

classic.

May be I'm a little fare behind. Someone spend money to buy KVR and now it is commercial? Who? How much? Why?

kara · Post by **kara** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:15 am

I don't like it but will live with it
There are more important things in live then a website layout

k

johnny2johnny · Post by **johnny2johnny** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:31 am

HunterKiller wrote:How ironic is that sig of yours Cookie. Indeed KVR has been assimilated and commercialised.

yeah its an ad matrix...

anyways, the latest post side bar matches. If the forum had variable width, It would be fantastic. I really like this color scheme better than the last. its ten times more slick. its very very nice.

johnny2johnny · Post by **johnny2johnny** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:32 am

and you have better smilie access!!!

metamorphosis · Post by **metamorphosis** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:43 am

You can add http://www.kvraudio.com/banners/* to adblock to get rid of the banners - or use flashblock-
ARGGGH! my eyes...

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:53 am

lol @ meta! I seriously get a tad headache when surfing here now..

L

metamorphosis · Post by **metamorphosis** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:12 am

A3ntar · Post by **A3ntar** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:33 pm

Psy-T wrote: if this is truly what you meant by option 2, i would like to inform you that every person who voted for it probably misunderstood you; people who care strictly about content and not functionality should have no problem just typing the entire url for each page they want to view, so ask the voters of that option, and see who really doesn't care about anything other than content. regardless, the inclusion of an indifference option only serves to skew the results and to force whomever cares about them to recalculate the figures himself.

Dude, you never learned that even the neutrals have the right to vote too! as neutrals....Why the discrimination?!

The poll option conveys exactly that message of indifference to the change of the layout.

Psy-T wrote: actually, it was. read above.

f**k, some of you guys are f**king anal-retentive with no possibility of anal leakage, whatsoever.

Psy-T, it doesn't take a friggin genious to figure out that if you want to do get the figure of the "general" dislikes, just add #3 and #4. #1 are the I like, and the #2 is the I don't care.

How friggin dare anyone out there make fun of my poll!!!

LEEEAVE MY POLLLLLLLL ALLLLLONE!…..

.

opia · Post by **opia** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:38 pm

I think things are coming along nicely

just noticed the 'latest music posted' section in that there 'dead space' area

Glassback · Post by **Glassback** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:03 pm

'Click to view Quick Reply' now!

That's something that's been a minor bugbear for a while, reaching the bottom of a thread and being snowblinded by that little box.

Psy-T · Post by **Psy-T** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:32 pm

A3ntar wrote:
Psy-T wrote: if this is truly what you meant by option 2, i would like to inform you that every person who voted for it probably misunderstood you; people who care strictly about content and not functionality should have no problem just typing the entire url for each page they want to view, so ask the voters of that option, and see who really doesn't care about anything other than content. regardless, the inclusion of an indifference option only serves to skew the results and to force whomever cares about them to recalculate the figures himself.
Dude, you never learned that even the neutrals have the right to vote too! as neutrals....Why the discrimination?!

The poll option conveys exactly that message of indifference to the change of the layout.

you missed my point mate; (most likely) none of the voters for the indifferent option would have voted for it if they knew what you truly meant with it (as you explained it in the previously quoted post).

A3ntar wrote:
Psy-T wrote: actually, it was. read above.

f**k, some of you guys are f**king anal-retentive with no possibility of anal leakage, whatsoever.

Psy-T, it doesn't take a friggin genious to figure out that if you want to do get the figure of the "general" dislikes, just add #3 and #4. #1 are the I like, and the #2 is the I don't care.

How friggin dare anyone out there make fun of my poll!!!

LEEEAVE MY POLLLLLLLL ALLLLLONE!…..

while on the anal-retentive binge: it doesn't take a f**king genius to spell the word genius properly

...just taking the piss mate

but on a more serious note: yes, i know it's rather simple to calculate the number, but it's a redundant step that most posters wouldn't care enough to go through.

by the way, the yes/no figures for the new design currently stand at 93% to 7% with 93% obviously standing for the ones who want rid of it.

Glassback · Post by **Glassback** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:36 pm

Just for the record, I was able to interpret the questions correctly all by myself and on my own.

KVR Audio

KVR Audio

New Website Layout...What do you think (the Vote)

What do you think of the new website layout?