AMD Ryzen latency
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 115 posts since 13 Aug, 2018
anyone who owns Ryzen based system, I'd be happy to know what's your output latency ? I've heard Ryzen can't go as low as Intel in terms of latency/buffer settings
-
- KVRAF
- 1929 posts since 4 Nov, 2004 from Manchester
It is.
The difference is the other half of the equation, in regards to how many tracks it can do at each of those buffers.
- KVRian
- 935 posts since 21 Aug, 2017 from Brasil
Wait for the new Ryzen 3000 series...
https://wccftech.com/asus-x570-motherbo ... -leak-out/
https://wccftech.com/asus-x570-motherbo ... -leak-out/
-
AdvancedFollower AdvancedFollower https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=418780
- KVRian
- 1233 posts since 8 May, 2018 from Sweden
Audio latency is a function of the ASIO buffer size, not the CPU. Ryzen can go just as low as Intel, but the performance hit from using lower buffer sizes is a bit greater on Ryzen. So at lower buffer sizes, Intel CPUs generally pull away from their Ryzen equivalents in terms of how many plugins/tracks you can use, while at higher buffer sizes, Ryzen is more competitive. The Ryzen 2000-series improved on this, and the 3000 series coming out this summer should be a further improvement.
Personally, I use 256 samples. I could go lower, but that's totally overkill for me. This is responsive enough that I can record MIDI parts on my keyboard without any issues. I'm running a Ryzen 1800X, 16 GB of 3200 MHz RAM at CAS14 and an Audiobox USB 96. My projects generally hit about 30 - 40% CPU in Studio One. I don't use crazy track counts or anything like that, but a few CPU heavy plugins like Diva, Repro, Lush-101, various channel strips and reverbs etc.
As for the DPC latency, it seems my GPU is the biggest culprit.
Personally, I use 256 samples. I could go lower, but that's totally overkill for me. This is responsive enough that I can record MIDI parts on my keyboard without any issues. I'm running a Ryzen 1800X, 16 GB of 3200 MHz RAM at CAS14 and an Audiobox USB 96. My projects generally hit about 30 - 40% CPU in Studio One. I don't use crazy track counts or anything like that, but a few CPU heavy plugins like Diva, Repro, Lush-101, various channel strips and reverbs etc.
As for the DPC latency, it seems my GPU is the biggest culprit.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 6 May, 2002
The Presonus Quantum2 is Thunderbolt2 and supposedly has the lowest RTL latency of any ASIO interface on the market.
Any word on a Ryzen chipset with native Thunderbolt3?
Any word on a Ryzen chipset with native Thunderbolt3?
AdvancedFollower wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:12 pm Audio latency is a function of the ASIO buffer size, not the CPU. Ryzen can go just as low as Intel, but the performance hit from using lower buffer sizes is a bit greater on Ryzen. So at lower buffer sizes, Intel CPUs generally pull away from their Ryzen equivalents in terms of how many plugins/tracks you can use, while at higher buffer sizes, Ryzen is more competitive. The Ryzen 2000-series improved on this, and the 3000 series coming out this summer should be a further improvement.
Personally, I use 256 samples. I could go lower, but that's totally overkill for me. This is responsive enough that I can record MIDI parts on my keyboard without any issues. I'm running a Ryzen 1800X, 16 GB of 3200 MHz RAM at CAS14 and an Audiobox USB 96. My projects generally hit about 30 - 40% CPU in Studio One. I don't use crazy track counts or anything like that, but a few CPU heavy plugins like Diva, Repro, Lush-101, various channel strips and reverbs etc.
As for the DPC latency, it seems my GPU is the biggest culprit.
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM
-
- KVRAF
- 1929 posts since 4 Nov, 2004 from Manchester
The Quantum is possibly the best value interface with super low latency but otherwise RME, Lynx & Marian would most likely all beg to differ on that statement.