Modular64? Modular128?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 456 posts since 16 Feb, 2017
Will Modular32 get even bigger? Allowing for more possibilities and combinations?
64..128......1024...lol
64..128......1024...lol
-
- KVRAF
- 10305 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
Can you give some specific examples of when you would use that?
Or, why not just load multiple Modular32s?
Or, why not just load multiple Modular32s?
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
I'm afraid it won't happen. Besides it doesn't make sense to me , 32 is the max I can do (well I could probably do 63, but that's a weird number )
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
- KVRian
- 1069 posts since 23 Sep, 2006
I originally asked for both 16 and 32. I'm satisfied with 32.
The reason I wanted 32 was in order to do a 16 band crossover on both the main input and the side chain, and combine their outputs, which required the 32 lanes.
With this setup I've been able to create a 16 band phatik set to match, which ultimately creates a very different type of morph/vocoder.
The limitation is really the crossover at this point. The next step up would be a full spectral system, but that would be a very different beast.
The reason I wanted 32 was in order to do a 16 band crossover on both the main input and the side chain, and combine their outputs, which required the 32 lanes.
With this setup I've been able to create a 16 band phatik set to match, which ultimately creates a very different type of morph/vocoder.
The limitation is really the crossover at this point. The next step up would be a full spectral system, but that would be a very different beast.