KVR Audio

pixel85 · Post by **pixel85** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 6:41 pm

plexuss wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:51 am In Logic X it doesnt load with a project rate of 88.1k or 96k. 44.1k and 48k are ok. deal breaker for me.

It works in Cubase but I think that everything run on double speed on 96kHz or sound designers are all up for Speedcore

EDIT: it sync to tempo when playback is on. When it's off then tempo is doubled

robotmonkey · Post by **robotmonkey** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:00 pm

Stefken wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 6:34 pm Shut the f**k up.
It's a moron like you that doesn't understand that the install is faulty (or a bad match with one of the major daws). I have literally installed hundreds of plugins without issue and i get this fuckup working too. By holding its hand. Where tickets are concerned: i hardly enter any ticket. Super cheap customer for support.

There's literally nothing wrong with Waves installer. It blows my mind how much whining and false information Waves installation, activation and WUP has been generating. It's like their products attract low IQ people for some reason.

I have been using Waves on my personal computer since the inception of V9 and on others since the mid 90's and have encountered almost no problems. There's obviously been rare small quirks but nothing major. Their products have always been dead easy to install and get working to. Waves Central could be more flexible but it too is super easy to use. There's just no way to mess up and people still do. The same goes for WUP - it's super easy to comprehend, yet somehow so many people just do not get it.

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:12 pm

Was demoing it this afternoon and after a while thought to myself - isn't this essentially the same as NI's Rounds?

Gamma-UT · Post by **Gamma-UT** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:07 pm

shonky wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:12 pm Was demoing it this afternoon and after a while thought to myself - isn't this essentially the same as NI's Rounds?

The snapshot sequencer made me think of Rounds - but Rounds is more flexible (and IMO better) in the hocketing department. Waves' implementation is a bit half-baked. Nice for arpeggios but a missed opportunity.

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:14 pm

On the plus side, it's made me dig out Rounds again and saved me $39...

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:15 pm

It's your round.

krabbencutter · Post by **krabbencutter** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:36 pm

Gamma-UT wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:07 pm
shonky wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:12 pm Was demoing it this afternoon and after a while thought to myself - isn't this essentially the same as NI's Rounds?
The snapshot sequencer made me think of Rounds - but Rounds is more flexible (and IMO better) in the hocketing department. Waves' implementation is a bit half-baked. Nice for arpeggios but a missed opportunity.

True, otoh Flow Motion has 3x the voices of Rounds while using only 1/3 of the CPU.

Gamma-UT · Post by **Gamma-UT** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:39 pm

Flow Motion also has a more extensive range of options for FM and PM. So it's all swings and roundabouts.

mcbpete · Post by **mcbpete** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 9:01 pm

topaz wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 12:27 pm Still using the same CPU with mix 0 so not off.

Aloysius wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 12:25 pm0 = Off

Just tried this at home with the init/basic patch

Delay and Reverb set to 0 mix = 7% CPU
Delay at 0, Reverb set to any non zero mix = 8% CPU
Delay and Reverb set to any non zero mix = 9% CPU

So yep definitely for me 0 = off.

hhuang9611 · Post by **hhuang9611** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 9:07 pm

Surely this plugin will be priced $29 in the future, so I will just keep waiting

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:09 pm

If that was the case all synths would do the same.

interruptor wrote:
No clicks and pops here on my 2010 middle of the range PC running win10.
Maybe you have background processes taxing on your CPU?

acYm · Post by **acYm** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 11:39 pm

lol there's 4 waveshells now? what the huck.

really glad most worthwhile plugins are in the 9.6.

synth guru · Post by **synth guru** » Thu Nov 29, 2018 11:59 pm

robotmonkey wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:00 pm It's like their products attract low IQ people for some reason.

And... they want to be engineers, it makes me laugh.

SLiC · Post by **SLiC** » Fri Nov 30, 2018 6:38 am

Strange that people are getting such different CPU use, I have it on an i7 win 10 64 and find it relatively light on cpu and have no issues at all, in fact it is light enough to be one of my ‘chosen few’ plugs to find its way on to my MS Surface DAW (in Bitwig)

pixel85 · Post by **pixel85** » Fri Nov 30, 2018 2:25 pm

Stefken wrote: ↑Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:39 am Now they still need to get rid of this Waveshell structure and provide some customisations in their install procedure. I'm guessing this won't happen for many years to come as it probably involves a serious change in their internal structure.

Once again, it's not a problem when you have modern DAW with plugin manager (I guess most of them?). For me, to see waveshells I need to open my file explorer and go to folder where these files are. I have not seen waveshell in DAW for very long time. Implementation of plugin manager is daw is much easier to do than changing Waves waveshell system and it also allow you to make your plugin list to look however you want it to.
Vote for plugin manager in your daw today!

Waves Flow Motion - New FM Synth