So, if having one of those is so important to you, go buy one. You can even buy a new Minimoog now. Owning and having owned several analogues, I am not so enthusiastic of emulations of things like the SH-101, Pro-One, Minimoog, whatever. They are limited, and only made sense in a time where the technology could not achieve better. If it could, I'm even convinced these would have never exist (as soon as the technology evolved, the synths that appeared were all much better - look at things like the Jupiter-8, the Prophet-10 or Prophet T8, Memorymoog, etc. (just to mention the same labels that manufactured the former). I wonder why someone would prefer an emulation of a Minimoog over an emulation of a Memorymoog, for example?jbuonacc wrote:that's nice? obviously the sound and behavior of an emulation doesn't matter much to you. thankfully it does to some devs. (why do you tend to get wrapped up in discussing things that you don't have any real interest or conviction in either way?) polyphony and "nice extras" should never be an issue for someone who wants the sound/behaviour of an SH-101, Pro-One, Minimoog, or whatever... and CPU usage be damned, if that's what it takes to do an acceptable job of it.fmr wrote: Emulations interest me less and less for what they are, especially emulations of limited stuff as the Mini is. And I would never buy a soft synth limited in what concerns polyphony.
As I wrote, I value emulations of things like the Matrix-12, the CS-80, the VCS-3, a SY99 (or FS1R), the PS-3300, the Synclavier, modular, and things like that. These were all synths that brought something to the table that was unique, and not easily recreated anywhere else. I want emulations of these because they are hard to find, crazily expensive, and even if I could get one, the maintenance would be a nightmare.jbuonacc wrote:i don't think you "value" emulations at all. as an emulation, bringing "new sounds and originality" to the table should be the least of anyone's concerns. plenty of other synths for that.fmr wrote:I tend to value emulations for what they ARE as softsynths, and what they add to the table, in terms of new sounds and originality.
Anyway, this is derailing the thread. Let's get back to the ARP 2600 (curiously enough, nobody ever asked for an ARP 2500 - again, I wonder why).