..which not works (joke) More rightly - not exactly clear, how works. With something yes, with something no.
UVI Falcon - hybrid instrument - version 3.01 released - rumors, ads, praise, mud wrestling and off-topic inside!
RELATED
PRODUCTS Alive - UVI Falcon Expansion Ambient Strings for Falcon / MachFive 3 Falcon Falcon AIR Falcon Singles - Acoustic E-Bow Falcon Singles - Ambient Piano Falcon Singles - Bass Flute Falcon Singles - Celtic Harp Falcon Singles - Crotales Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol.1 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol2 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol3 Falcon Singles - Frame Drums & Friends Falcon Singles - Glockenspiel Falcon Singles - HANG Falcon Singles - Oud Falcon Singles - Stick Cello Falcon Singles - Water Bells Falcon Singles Singing Bowls & Friends NOIZE Textures (Wav/Dune Presets) Scattered Entity Vol. 1 for Falcon/MachFive 3
PRODUCTS Alive - UVI Falcon Expansion Ambient Strings for Falcon / MachFive 3 Falcon Falcon AIR Falcon Singles - Acoustic E-Bow Falcon Singles - Ambient Piano Falcon Singles - Bass Flute Falcon Singles - Celtic Harp Falcon Singles - Crotales Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol.1 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol2 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol3 Falcon Singles - Frame Drums & Friends Falcon Singles - Glockenspiel Falcon Singles - HANG Falcon Singles - Oud Falcon Singles - Stick Cello Falcon Singles - Water Bells Falcon Singles Singing Bowls & Friends NOIZE Textures (Wav/Dune Presets) Scattered Entity Vol. 1 for Falcon/MachFive 3
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 16138 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
That makes sense if you apply layer unison to one kind of oscillator, but when you use different kind of oscillators unison pan spread should work without messing with the phases.Whywhy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:34 pm About the Unison voices modulator, it seams to be link with the oscillator phase :
Ini a new layer, load an Analog stack osc, make it free phase running via the list Tree, add a unison bi polar modulator to the key group pan or to the osc pan : it works.
( only if the phase is free running)
If you want to have a kind of unison distribution controls, you can use the modulation mapper, set the size = to your unison voices count. Clearly powerful:)
-
- KVRAF
- 2311 posts since 20 Oct, 2014
Dear Falcon team, thanks for this great update, free for your customers. I have some suggestions for consideration for you:
- Provide a demo of Falcon. Again a colleague asked for that, I think he won't buy it now, because he cannot test it. This is not the first time.
- Could you allow the fx to be routed to a separate output, or maybe even per fx?
- You know this, but there is NO UNDO
- Improve workflow for copying settings from one sound to another, for instance using a XML text copy-paste buffer which works cross-instance. Improve saving of parts of complex setups, not only on atomar level.
- Provide a demo of Falcon. Again a colleague asked for that, I think he won't buy it now, because he cannot test it. This is not the first time.
- Could you allow the fx to be routed to a separate output, or maybe even per fx?
- You know this, but there is NO UNDO
- Improve workflow for copying settings from one sound to another, for instance using a XML text copy-paste buffer which works cross-instance. Improve saving of parts of complex setups, not only on atomar level.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 16138 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
So e.g. with the FM oscillator one has to modulate the phases of a carrier with the unison/unipolar unison/random/unipolar random modulator in order for unison pan spread to have an effect, so it's always related to phases (when not using detune, then it always works of course).Sampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:03 pmThat makes sense if you apply layer unison to one kind of oscillator, but when you use different kind of oscillators unison pan spread should work without messing with the phases.Whywhy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:34 pm About the Unison voices modulator, it seams to be link with the oscillator phase :
Ini a new layer, load an Analog stack osc, make it free phase running via the list Tree, add a unison bi polar modulator to the key group pan or to the osc pan : it works.
( only if the phase is free running)
If you want to have a kind of unison distribution controls, you can use the modulation mapper, set the size = to your unison voices count. Clearly powerful:)
- KVRian
- 821 posts since 11 Aug, 2018 from UE
100 % agree with you!Sampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:03 pmThat makes sense if you apply layer unison to one kind of oscillator, but when you use different kind of oscillators unison pan spread should work without messing with the phases.Whywhy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:34 pm About the Unison voices modulator, it seams to be link with the oscillator phase :
Ini a new layer, load an Analog stack osc, make it free phase running via the list Tree, add a unison bi polar modulator to the key group pan or to the osc pan : it works.
( only if the phase is free running)
If you want to have a kind of unison distribution controls, you can use the modulation mapper, set the size = to your unison voices count. Clearly powerful:)
Best
YY
YY
-
- KVRAF
- 2393 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
Regarding the pan unisson stuff. Will check tomorrow the thread more precisely but right out of my head.
In case of stereo or mono scillator if there is no random phase and no detune, you have two oscillator running in perfect sync (Perfect digital copy) hence there is no stereo effect even if you pan one left and the other right.
There are no pitch drift or free running oscillator that would give a stereo effect.
In case of stereo or mono scillator if there is no random phase and no detune, you have two oscillator running in perfect sync (Perfect digital copy) hence there is no stereo effect even if you pan one left and the other right.
There are no pitch drift or free running oscillator that would give a stereo effect.
-
- KVRAF
- 2393 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
Beware of mono oscillator as well where pan wouldn’t work
-
- KVRAF
- 2393 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
MIDI CC automation is not working ?
- KVRAF
- 10359 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
SLiC wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:16 amDefinitely a steep learning curve...one of the only synths I have ever owned where I needed to read the manual just to get a sound out of a blank patch!
Once you get the basic workflow and (and to me this was key) name a load of template blank patches to your taste it’s pretty fast...I prefer it to Halion and Kontact anyway....
I am NOT finding the overall synth difficult to understand at all. Why on earth do people constantly use the excuse of "it's difficult/complex to learn!" with bad UI design? These two things are not at all the same.
I have zero problems understanding Falcon. It is NOT a difficult piece of software at all. The core concepts of how it works is super simple.
Falcon requires quite a few extra clicks to either get the information you need (for instance my macro knob example earlier) or to have it do what you need it to do.
Last edited by bmanic on Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
- KVRAF
- 23101 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
-
- KVRist
- 277 posts since 2 Apr, 2016
Hi Oliver,
Great work on Falcon 2!
Yes, midi CC automation is working like a charm.
I think my description failed me, I am looking for a way to modulate the stop using an internal modulator, the multi step for example or a square lfo
As an example, I am trying to achieve this scenario:
Sound 1 has tape echo effect, stop is triggered after X seconds, Sound 2 fades in as Sound 1 fades out. All can be set up to be sequentially achieved accept the stop after X time. As far as I can tell, it needs externally triggered (midi cc or manual click).
I’m sure I’ve never seen any program accomplish this and the reader may be thinking “overreach”, but those are just 2 reasons I adore Falcon.
-
- KVRist
- 277 posts since 2 Apr, 2016
- KVRAF
- 13195 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
yes but b, that you don't find it difficult just means that, you don't find it difficult, doesn't mean those are other ppl's experiences.bmanic wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:54 pm .........
I am NOT finding the overall synth difficult to understand at all. Why on earth do people constantly use the excuse of "it's difficult/complex to learn!" with bad UI design? These two things are not at all the same.
I have zero problems understanding Falcon. It is NOT a difficult piece of software at all. The core concepts of how it works is super simple.
.......
I personally have never used Falcon so can't comment either way, but certainly I am old enough and around software enough to know that some UI/UX gel with some people and dont' gel with others at all and vice versa.
rsp
sound sculptist