Logic Pro X 10.3 and GarageBand Updates out today
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 11053 posts since 12 May, 2008
Wow, as the mac ecosystem seems to be going downhill, Logic and Garageband really seem to be amping up their game. I even noticed that Garageband has some kind of looping view not so unlike Ableton Live or Bitwig. Does Logic have this kind of thing too? Or is that just an ipad thing? Years back I always said I'd go back to Logic if they had a loop matrix type view. I always did like Logic's instruments and effects better than anything else on the market, and that was before Alchemy was part of it...
-
- KVRian
- 640 posts since 7 Oct, 2006
well, the new UI - quite nice, in some spots it looks a bit 'unrefined' or 'unfinished', but overall, quite nice IMHO ( always like Ableton's flat UI)
- music xml import
- midi plugins can remote control any automatable plug-in params on the same channel strip - sounds interesting if also true for scripts
some nice additions
best
- music xml import
- midi plugins can remote control any automatable plug-in params on the same channel strip - sounds interesting if also true for scripts
some nice additions
best
- KVRAF
- 6113 posts since 7 Jan, 2005 from Corporate States of America
The industry was doing it some before Apple followed suit, yes, but then Apple joining the bandwagon made it worse.jdnz wrote:the entire industry is going 'flat' (not just on macos/ios) -Jace-BeOS wrote: I hate flat. This is enraging me. Apple's taste in design has turned from the arguably best to the absolute worst. And seeing how excruciatingly long we have had to wait for updates to Logic (pro users and content creators being utterly unimportant to current Apple executives), it'll take forever for this crap to be undone whenever someone new comes to power at Apple and changes the aesthetic direction back away from low-effort, amateur, flat and low-contrast garbage.
Apple was supposed to be a trend setter, not a follower... They've made the fad into an entrenched trend because people tend to copy them, mostly because of the image of knowing what they're doing, and their prior reputation for quality of design they no longer execute on.
Uh, that's a common explanation I've seen but the actual details of the software (and websites!) doing it don't seem to be validating this excuse. Things aren't more efficient or even adaptable. They're slower, on top of being harder to read and less clear to operate. The websites and apps don't adapt to canvas changes in a usable manner. "Responsive design" has been an abortion. It's anything but responsive to the user and it's often ugly and outright broken.jdnz wrote:driven by the need for scalable UIs to handle the massive range of screens people have (will only get worse as the first 8K monitors hit the market)
More importantly, Apple tried a vector GUI engine in-house. It didn't work out. There was far less control and consistency over the elements' behaviors when everything was freely scaled. They ended up standardizing on specific multiplications of bitmap resolutions to solve the need for scaling and sharpness.
I never asked for 3D. I just want distinctiveness, readability, self-evident differences between individual apps, and between their controls, text fields, editable text fields, etc... Vector art can be VERY rich and detailed. It can get almost photo realistic. This flat trash fad isn't necessary for vector GUI design. Look at Image Line's new vector UIs. Depth and detail (though not as much as before, but it's not simplistic and incomplete trash like Apple and most mobile app developers are doing now).jdnz wrote:beautifully rendered '3d' UIs just aren't feasible any more
The cause isn't vectors. It's laziness and an unwillingness to pay for detailed design to be done by skilled designers. The way people have been indoctrinated into blasting detailed design as "self indulgent" is grotesque.
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud
my music @ SoundCloud
- KVRian
- 736 posts since 29 Nov, 2015
Yehaaw!! I was really hoping for a "patcher" kind of feature being able to have a complex multi-lane fx setup for a single track with band splitting built in (like in Studio One, or kHz multipass), maybe in 10.3.1
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 16369 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
- KVRAF
- 8680 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
Finally side chaining directly from instruments instead of just audio tracks!
I think the new UI is fantastic actually.
I think the new UI is fantastic actually.
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
- KVRAF
- 5179 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
Modulation of automation parameters via midi FX is great.
I was hoping that i also could modulate the midi FX itself with another midi FX, no
Also it seems there is just the modulator usable.
The arp or randomizer would be great as modulation source too....maybe one day.
But finally i have a fast and easy way to use an envelope or LFO to control my FX plug-ins like B2.
I was hoping that i also could modulate the midi FX itself with another midi FX, no
Also it seems there is just the modulator usable.
The arp or randomizer would be great as modulation source too....maybe one day.
But finally i have a fast and easy way to use an envelope or LFO to control my FX plug-ins like B2.
-
- KVRAF
- 35410 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
If people demand flat, then it would be pretty stupid not to offer that. You see it everywhere. If people considered it ugly or unusable, then GUI designers would hardly follow that trend.Jace-BeOS wrote:The industry was doing it some before Apple followed suit, yes, but then Apple joining the bandwagon made it worse.jdnz wrote:the entire industry is going 'flat' (not just on macos/ios) -Jace-BeOS wrote: I hate flat. This is enraging me. Apple's taste in design has turned from the arguably best to the absolute worst. And seeing how excruciatingly long we have had to wait for updates to Logic (pro users and content creators being utterly unimportant to current Apple executives), it'll take forever for this crap to be undone whenever someone new comes to power at Apple and changes the aesthetic direction back away from low-effort, amateur, flat and low-contrast garbage.
Apple was supposed to be a trend setter, not a follower... They've made the fad into an entrenched trend because people tend to copy them, mostly because of the image of knowing what they're doing, and their prior reputation for quality of design they no longer execute on.
-
- KVRAF
- 2374 posts since 16 Jan, 2013
- KVRAF
- 2275 posts since 4 Dec, 2011 from Brasília, Brazil
This flat UI seems faster than the previous UI?
(I don't own Logic but own Mainstage, and sooner or latter most of the changes in Logic appears on Mainstage)
(I don't own Logic but own Mainstage, and sooner or latter most of the changes in Logic appears on Mainstage)
My soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/waltercruz
-
- KVRAF
- 5179 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
From my first experiences, yes.waltercruz wrote:This flat UI seems faster than the previous UI?
(I don't own Logic but own Mainstage, and sooner or latter most of the changes in Logic appears on Mainstage)
- KVRAF
- 6113 posts since 7 Jan, 2005 from Corporate States of America
Who's demanding it? People who understand design or people who want novelty? This is a corporate/developer-driven trend, not a user-driven trend. It's cheap and quick and therefore they've decided to make a design aesthetic to promote it.chk071 wrote:If people demand flat, then it would be pretty stupid not to offer that. You see it everywhere. If people considered it ugly or unusable, then GUI designers would hardly follow that trend.Jace-BeOS wrote:The industry was doing it some before Apple followed suit, yes, but then Apple joining the bandwagon made it worse.jdnz wrote:the entire industry is going 'flat' (not just on macos/ios) -Jace-BeOS wrote: I hate flat. This is enraging me. Apple's taste in design has turned from the arguably best to the absolute worst. And seeing how excruciatingly long we have had to wait for updates to Logic (pro users and content creators being utterly unimportant to current Apple executives), it'll take forever for this crap to be undone whenever someone new comes to power at Apple and changes the aesthetic direction back away from low-effort, amateur, flat and low-contrast garbage.
Apple was supposed to be a trend setter, not a follower... They've made the fad into an entrenched trend because people tend to copy them, mostly because of the image of knowing what they're doing, and their prior reputation for quality of design they no longer execute on.
Trends and fads shouldn't define user interface design functionality. People who aren't UI experts shouldn't be the ones dictating UI design. Developers who suck at design are supposed to work with designers. Instead, it's become "kill all non-code experts, we don't need em".
As for users promoting it... There was never "demand" for flat design in any functional sense. There were geeks demanding change for the sake of change because of their tech geek boredom, the same as end users demanding more novelty. Everyone who defends flat design uses the same memes to talk about it: "clean", "minimal", and "fresh". No one defends it with any actual meaningful language, because the fact is that there's very little objective value to this aesthetic and a lot of negatives. I watch people suffering with this crappy UI convention and it's all because of a fad that they suffer.
Fads are rarely logical choices. They're reactionary, poorly considered, and temporary. They usually end up becoming hated in hindsight. Look to style fads of the 70s, 80s...
It's ludicrous that we FINALLY have high-ppi displays and the level of graphical detail has gone retrograde and plummeted to where GUIs barely look like they've gotten out of the prototype or even planning stage.
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud
my music @ SoundCloud
-
- KVRAF
- 35410 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Why? Because you say so? If something sells like hot cakes, would you say that it's not what people want, and demand, but rather something corporate-driven? I really don't get your argumentation. Just because you don't like doesn't mean noone likes it. Actually i find the flat trend pretty nice, because it's simple and usable. Take Google Android for example, that's just an excellent example of flat design done right. Windows 10, even though not quite as good as that, is better, more clear and simple than former Windows version too for me. And the design teams at Google, Apple, or Microsoft aren't exactly stupid too, and would develop designs past the will of users.Jace-BeOS wrote:Who's demanding it? People who understand design or people who want novelty? This is a corporate/developer-driven trend, not a user-driven trend.chk071 wrote:If people demand flat, then it would be pretty stupid not to offer that. You see it everywhere. If people considered it ugly or unusable, then GUI designers would hardly follow that trend.Jace-BeOS wrote:The industry was doing it some before Apple followed suit, yes, but then Apple joining the bandwagon made it worse.jdnz wrote:the entire industry is going 'flat' (not just on macos/ios) -Jace-BeOS wrote: I hate flat. This is enraging me. Apple's taste in design has turned from the arguably best to the absolute worst. And seeing how excruciatingly long we have had to wait for updates to Logic (pro users and content creators being utterly unimportant to current Apple executives), it'll take forever for this crap to be undone whenever someone new comes to power at Apple and changes the aesthetic direction back away from low-effort, amateur, flat and low-contrast garbage.
Apple was supposed to be a trend setter, not a follower... They've made the fad into an entrenched trend because people tend to copy them, mostly because of the image of knowing what they're doing, and their prior reputation for quality of design they no longer execute on.
- KVRAF
- 6113 posts since 7 Jan, 2005 from Corporate States of America
You're missing the point: people liking it doesn't mean it's better.
https://www.fastcodesign.com/3058094/th ... -ux-expert
But then your response ("Why? Because you say so?") [suggests to me that] you might not care about expertise, so it probably does no good for me to cite experts...
PS: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2672 ... -expertise
https://www.fastcodesign.com/3058094/th ... -ux-expert
But then your response ("Why? Because you say so?") [suggests to me that] you might not care about expertise, so it probably does no good for me to cite experts...
PS: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2672 ... -expertise
Last edited by Jace-BeOS on Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud
my music @ SoundCloud