One Synth Challenge #89: Tunefish4 by Brain Control (Meakaale wins!)
- KVRAF
- 2110 posts since 5 Oct, 2015 from Swedish / Living in Hong Kong
Hi Gabriel and welcome to OSC. Basically you can say that any effect that alter the original sound too much are not allowed. You must still be able to hear that it is Tunefish. But it is of course very subjective. I used Flux Bitter Sweet in the past and it is allowed (I checked). Compressors are allowed. Chorus effects are not allowed and you should go easy on saturation effect and distortion.
Arpeggiators I am not really sure about but I Think it is allowed since it will not alter the sound and you can basically accomplish the same thing with the DAW alone.
Good luck!
Arpeggiators I am not really sure about but I Think it is allowed since it will not alter the sound and you can basically accomplish the same thing with the DAW alone.
Good luck!
Win 10 -64bit, CPU i7-7700K, 32Gb, Focusrite 2i2, FL-studio 20, Studio One 4, Reason 10
-
- KVRian
- 639 posts since 20 Jan, 2013
...unless you record the output of the midi generating device like an arpeggiator or sequencer or whatever to midi within the DAW, which is fine according to our previous conversations about thisz.prime wrote:Compressors are fine and transient shapers, since they're just volume automation, basically. Modulation fx like chorus are not allowed. Freeware / DAW built in arpeggiators are fine, commercial ones are not.Gabriel Garcia wrote:... what effects are allowed. I know reverb and delay are, but can we use compressors? what about transient shapers like Flux's Bitter Sweet? And MIDI plugins like arpeggiators?
-
Gabriel Garcia Gabriel Garcia https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=351740
- KVRist
- 58 posts since 18 Feb, 2015 from Argentina
Thanks for the quick answers guys! All effects I'm using for the challenge are freeware or built in, so no problem with that. I asked because I used Bitter Sweet in the kick track to enhance the "click" and Soundgoodizer to compress the volume level and an overall enhancing. Now it sounds a lot better to me, but maybe that counts as "changing the sound too much".
-
marks-a-whybikky marks-a-whybikky https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=156576
- KVRist
- 184 posts since 30 Jul, 2007
- KVRAF
- 2133 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
Probably not a problem. People use transient shapers, eq, automation, compression, multiband compression, and all other things to make the tracks sound good. The key word, at least to me is 'unrecognizable'. It might be louder, a longer tail, thinner, but if it's fundamentally the same sound, I think you'll find it pretty ok.Gabriel Garcia wrote:Thanks for the quick answers guys! All effects I'm using for the challenge are freeware or built in, so no problem with that. I asked because I used Bitter Sweet in the kick track to enhance the "click" and Soundgoodizer to compress the volume level and an overall enhancing. Now it sounds a lot better to me, but maybe that counts as "changing the sound too much".
- KVRAF
- 2133 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
I should start a tunefish track soon. So... little... time... this... month...
-
- KVRian
- 711 posts since 11 Mar, 2014 from Netherlands
And I'll bet, in no time he comes up with an amazing trackz.prime wrote:I should start a tunefish track soon. So... little... time... this... month...
- KVRist
- 182 posts since 23 Nov, 2007 from New York
Here are some presets in .fxb format.
Cymbals notes need to be very short to sound longerYou do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
not every horse is a racehorse
- KVRAF
- 2133 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
Well, I dunno. I got something sorta good, a starting point anyway, but then I reloaded it and many of the patches I created are screwed. Not a cool way to work. :-/rghvdberg wrote:And I'll bet, in no time he comes up with an amazing trackz.prime wrote:I should start a tunefish track soon. So... little... time... this... month...
- KVRian
- 951 posts since 30 Oct, 2013 from Scarborough
Z. - there may be a way to recover your patches. Try reloading the file, and then on any instance where the patch does not work go into the synth interface and select patch 0. Your most recently saved settings for that instance should be there.z.prime wrote:Well, I dunno. I got something sorta good, a starting point anyway, but then I reloaded it and many of the patches I created are screwed. Not a cool way to work. :-/
If you do this for each instance that is wrong you might get back to where you left off.
Hope it helps
https://rjsemper.wixsite.com/website
One Synth Challenge - https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/about
One Synth Challenge - https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/about
-
- KVRian
- 711 posts since 11 Mar, 2014 from Netherlands
That's the way Tunefish4 is testing you if you are worthy to use itz.prime wrote:Well, I dunno. I got something sorta good, a starting point anyway, but then I reloaded it and many of the patches I created are screwed. Not a cool way to work. :-/rghvdberg wrote:And I'll bet, in no time he comes up with an amazing trackz.prime wrote:I should start a tunefish track soon. So... little... time... this... month...
But seriously, this sucks.
- KVRAF
- 2133 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
Thanks, seems these were made from patch 0 (or at least, it was still reading Saaaaw). Maybe I cycled through presets on an instance or something... It wasn't as widespread as I thought at first (it was just a couple, including one of the predominant sounds in the track!!) I recreated the patches again and saved Bitwig presets that I verified loaded up... and now it seems to be working. Hmm. Thank you, though!RichardSemper wrote:... there may be a way to recover your patches. Try reloading the file, and then on any instance where the patch does not work go into the synth interface and select patch 0. Your most recently saved settings for that instance should be there.
-
- KVRian
- 711 posts since 11 Mar, 2014 from Netherlands
quick mock up
I know this gonna please the old-timers
Disregard the sloppy playing ..
https://soundcloud.com/rghvdberg/rghvdb ... h4/s-wOC99
I know this gonna please the old-timers
Disregard the sloppy playing ..
https://soundcloud.com/rghvdberg/rghvdb ... h4/s-wOC99
-
- KVRist
- 38 posts since 9 Jan, 2013 from Oslo, Norway
Hi. I am not able to make this work in Tunefish 4 (latest version as per today). fxb wont load through the "load fxb" procedure, and the only thing that seem to work is to add "programs" to the default "program" list where the factory programs are followed by new in a squencial, not broken, number sequence.sfiks wrote:Here are some presets in .fxb format.Cymbals notes need to be very short to sound longer
How do I turn your fxb into these "programs"?
Mac Pro 3,2Ghz - 10TB - 20GB, Cubase 10 + 8 + 7 + 5 + 4, Logic X, Yamaha 01v96, Hammerfall RAYDAT.