One Synth Challenge #87: Podolski by U-he (Jasinski Wins!)
-
- KVRist
- 142 posts since 28 Jan, 2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDy5j0c6TrU
for those who like sound design. nothing to do with osc but I thought Id share
for those who like sound design. nothing to do with osc but I thought Id share
-
- KVRian
- 800 posts since 20 Oct, 2003 from Seattle
Here are some test drums I made- all using Podolski
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uw3vkp1nltcr7 ... t.mp3?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uw3vkp1nltcr7 ... t.mp3?dl=0
- KVRAF
- 2133 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
So... groovy... butt won't stop moving...jasinski wrote:Here are some test drums I made- all using Podolski
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uw3vkp1nltcr7 ... t.mp3?dl=0
-
- KVRist
- 116 posts since 13 Feb, 2006
jasinski -- those hats are incredible.
-
- KVRian
- 800 posts since 20 Oct, 2003 from Seattle
Sharing drum presets and here's an example of how I did the midi for the hi-hats.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 2110 posts since 5 Oct, 2015 from Swedish / Living in Hong Kong
I been Reading the rules and free plugins are allowed in some extent. Excluded are such that alter the sound by modulation and other similar to that. But I wonder, is transient designers (free ones) allowed?
Win 10 -64bit, CPU i7-7700K, 32Gb, Focusrite 2i2, FL-studio 20, Studio One 4, Reason 10
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2688 posts since 19 Dec, 2010 from North America
YesATN69 wrote:I been Reading the rules and free plugins are allowed in some extent. Excluded are such that alter the sound by modulation and other similar to that. But I wonder, is transient designers (free ones) allowed?
One Synth Challenge: https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/about
-
- KVRian
- 711 posts since 11 Mar, 2014 from Netherlands
Yay!
https://soundcloud.com/rghvdberg/osc87- ... berg-hihat
I'm so proud
https://soundcloud.com/rghvdberg/osc87- ... berg-hihat
Code: Select all
/*@meta
Author:
'rghvdberg'
Description:
'Hi Hat'
Usage:
'Play clusters (C5 through E5)
Adjust velocity to your needs'
*/
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by rghvdberg on Wed May 04, 2016 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 711 posts since 11 Mar, 2014 from Netherlands
slowly getting there
still only 1 layer of kick and snare
https://soundcloud.com/rghvdberg/osc87- ... are-hi-hat
still only 1 layer of kick and snare
https://soundcloud.com/rghvdberg/osc87- ... are-hi-hat
Last edited by rghvdberg on Wed May 04, 2016 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRian
- 641 posts since 26 May, 2008 from Iceland.
Holy shit the arp on this thing is awesome! Why didn't anyone tell me about it !
"People are stupid" Gegard Mousasi.
-
- DASH Guy
- 7951 posts since 20 Sep, 2001
Since my first OSC ever was fun and interesting (and thanks gain for choosing Sinnah)
I'll try make something with this Podolski.
BTW during the past OSC some thoughts occurred to me about the rules,
1) since there's not limit to the number of instances to be used,
Additive synthesis is always possible.
2) since there's not limit to BPM and you can used delays
Granular synthesis is always possible.
3) since you can used overdrives and distortions
Waveshaping synthesis is always possible.
4) since you can use any EQ and automation
Subtractive synthesis is always possible.
5) since there's restriction on which DAW to use
the more powerful are the modular features of the DAW used
the easier are the synthesis techniques above.
"*quite in theory I admit*"
So given enough skills and time, all one needs is a single ocillator
and almost all sounds can be synthesized.
But fortunately the time is limited so many characteristics of the chosen
synth comes out, and of course the more character the synth has the more
it can get through. Still I would limit the number of instances to be used.
I apologized in advance if those are already said or known things.
I'm a beginner here.
I'll try make something with this Podolski.
BTW during the past OSC some thoughts occurred to me about the rules,
1) since there's not limit to the number of instances to be used,
Additive synthesis is always possible.
2) since there's not limit to BPM and you can used delays
Granular synthesis is always possible.
3) since you can used overdrives and distortions
Waveshaping synthesis is always possible.
4) since you can use any EQ and automation
Subtractive synthesis is always possible.
5) since there's restriction on which DAW to use
the more powerful are the modular features of the DAW used
the easier are the synthesis techniques above.
"*quite in theory I admit*"
So given enough skills and time, all one needs is a single ocillator
and almost all sounds can be synthesized.
But fortunately the time is limited so many characteristics of the chosen
synth comes out, and of course the more character the synth has the more
it can get through. Still I would limit the number of instances to be used.
I apologized in advance if those are already said or known things.
I'm a beginner here.
Last edited by liqih on Wed May 04, 2016 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 2133 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
Your are right, you can achieve lots by stacking instances, using EQ. But the things you list aren't always true. For example, many synths use free running oscillators, making it impossible to reliably phase align the waveforms. Many synths don't have a way to get a pure sine wave, either. Different synths will result in different characteristics and capabilities.liqih wrote:... some thoughts occurred to me about the rules,
[various types of] synthesis is always possible.
... I would limit the number of instances to be used.
But, it's perfectly acceptable to push the boundaries like you describe, which is part of the beauty of this competition! That said, actually making awesome sounds in practice would be much harder than stacking just a few instances to achieve additive synthesis, no practical need to limit the number of instances.
- KVRAF
- 2133 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
Yes, good sounding hats especially, mate. Hats off to you...rghvdberg wrote:slowly getting there
-
- DASH Guy
- 7951 posts since 20 Sep, 2001
Yes I agree, I tried to said that about the characteristics ,z.prime wrote:Your are right, you can achieve lots by stacking instances, using EQ. But the things you list aren't always true. For example, many synths use free running oscillators, making it impossible to reliably phase align the waveforms. Many synths don't have a way to get a pure sine wave, either. Different synths will result in different characteristics and capabilities.liqih wrote:... some thoughts occurred to me about the rules,
[various types of] synthesis is always possible.
... I would limit the number of instances to be used.
and now I added above "*quite in theory I admit*" about the synthesis, <wink>
Yes maybe not, mine were just some thoughts to share, not really a proposition.But, it's perfectly acceptable to push the boundaries like you describe, which is part of the beauty of this competition! That said, actually making awesome sounds in practice would be much harder than stacking just a few instances to achieve additive synthesis, no practical need to limit the number of instances.
Now gonna spend some minutes with Podolski.
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Making a temporary return to the OSC only because I always wanted to make a track with this synth as I've never really used it having owned Zebra 2, Diva, Bazille and other U-he synths. This one always just got pushed to the side.
Anyway, here are the specs
Cubase 7.0.7
11 instances of Podolski
FX Used
Cubase Compressor
Cubase GEQ10 EQ
Cubase Reverence Reverb
Cubase Stereo Delay
Cubase Limiter
Cuabse MorphFilter
Limiter 6
I fully expect to finish at the bottom as usual, but this was more for me and my pleasure to see if I could make something musical with this thing.
Here's the finished track
https://soundcloud.com/steven-wagenheim ... jam-osc-87
Anyway, here are the specs
Cubase 7.0.7
11 instances of Podolski
FX Used
Cubase Compressor
Cubase GEQ10 EQ
Cubase Reverence Reverb
Cubase Stereo Delay
Cubase Limiter
Cuabse MorphFilter
Limiter 6
I fully expect to finish at the bottom as usual, but this was more for me and my pleasure to see if I could make something musical with this thing.
Here's the finished track
https://soundcloud.com/steven-wagenheim ... jam-osc-87