Summary of the points made for easy reading:Harry_HH wrote:You have obviously talent to write even a Ph.D dissertation - this was so complicated, I think not even the author knows what its supposed to mean. (Or maybe this was the whole idea).rp314 wrote:But that's what's so great about good music, no? If for whatever reasons someone wants to denigrate or diminish some artist or work by picking at the weak elements (not necessarily referring to anyone in this thread, of course), that generally doesn't seem to fare too well in keeping others from finding the jewels.Harry_HH wrote: The video example of the Zappa is not the most representative to demonstrate his multi-skills.
In the end we all have our preferences but especially for those who make music the question of liking something is never as important IMHO as that of trying to seek out the wonderful stuff that's in there. And if some great composer for whatever reasons just never quite appeals to us that doesn't mean we won't receive their greatness via the works of others who somehow got it and ran with it.
1) Not every artist is good at everything; people can choose to pick on their weaknesses or celebrate their strengths
2) With this in mind, it doesn't matter if you like an artists' music or not, because there's always something to gain from looking at what they do right. Your distaste shouldn't totally blind you from appreciating what's good about a certain song.
3) So, by trying to find wisdom even in art we don't like, there's a lot to be learned.
Not too complicated, just delivered a little ramblingly.