c++ vs synthedit and other mod devs
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 422 posts since 18 Sep, 2006 from Detroit,MI,USA
When it comes to music and art. We have always had the haters who snobbed progress or computer tech that gave artist or composer a run for their money.
Drummers hated the drum machine
Composers and music notation writers despised the digital synquencer.
Hardware techs still are hurting from the golden age of software audio programs.
Even electronic musicians who use the infamous FL studio hate the new age artist that use the Download a beat sites.
Sorry haters life goes on, I dont practice c++ I dropped c for java , because thats where the money at, us freware devs gotta eat.
Drummers hated the drum machine
Composers and music notation writers despised the digital synquencer.
Hardware techs still are hurting from the golden age of software audio programs.
Even electronic musicians who use the infamous FL studio hate the new age artist that use the Download a beat sites.
Sorry haters life goes on, I dont practice c++ I dropped c for java , because thats where the money at, us freware devs gotta eat.
- KVRAF
- 4807 posts since 10 Feb, 2006 from Stockholm, Sweden
Yeah I dropped C++ over 12 years ago to support SynthEdit and later SynthMaker. C++ just didn't work for me, and was super expensive, while SynthEdit did the job done, and was rather cheap!
SynthEdit or SynthMaker doesn't have all that trinkets, bells and whistles that C++ has, but it manages to get the job done. And besides: I'm a musician, not an engineer!
SynthEdit or SynthMaker doesn't have all that trinkets, bells and whistles that C++ has, but it manages to get the job done. And besides: I'm a musician, not an engineer!
- Beware the Quoth
- 33109 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
reverse snobbery
my other modular synth is a bugbrand